The Alleged Fate of the ‘Resettled’ Jews
If the Nazis really had
resettled some two million Jews into the occupied Soviet territories, the
question then remains over the ultimate fate of the deportees. Instead of
evacuating the surviving Jews back into German occupied Europe, as the Germans
did in many other cases (including more than 20,000 from Kaunas and Riga[180], two
sites claimed to be primary resettlement destinations by Revisionists),
according to MGK the Nazis left the Jews to be liberated by the advancing Red
Army. Such
a liberation would necessarily leave traces in the form of numerous mentions in
the Soviet news stories, internal Soviet documents (such as Red Army reports
and NKGB reports), and memoirs and interviews by the former Soviet servicemen
and locals. Given the numbers of people involved and the scale of the events,
even if one wanted to suppress such information for some incomprehensible
reason, it wouldn't have been possible even during Stalin's reign (rumor always
finds a way to spread), much less in subsequent years, and especially not after
the fall of the USSR and opening of the archives in Russia and other former
Soviet republics (most of which use these archives effectively to expose Soviet
crimes, including deportations). The Soviet censorship system was powerful, but
to hide the liberation of hundreds of thousand of Jews it would have to have
been omnipotent. Lacking any corroboration for their story of Soviet liberation of the
resettled Jews, one could easily reject MGK’s thesis as without foundation on
that basis alone. As will be seen, however, their hypothesis fails on every
evidentiary aspect.
To explain the disappearance and silence of the two
million ‘resettled’ Jews, MGK speciously claim that the majority of Polish and
Western European Jews had been captured and transported to the eastern areas of
the country, secluded from the outside world, where MGK “assume that they
disappeared in camps they would never leave.”[181] While
the postwar deportations in the Soviet Union had for decades been marred in
obscurity (an obscurity MGK manipulate to their advantage), the fall of the
Soviet state has opened the relevant files to researchers over the last two
decades which help present a picture of what truly happened during the time
period. These newly available documents certainly refute MGK’s conjecture to
explain the disappearance of Jews, for instead of an anti-Jewish deportation
scheme the efforts were largely related to a renewed dekulakization program and
other Sovietization efforts. While a few researchers believed in a planned
anti-Jewish deportation program in the postwar years, a detailed analysis of
the evidence finds that such a plan was more mythical than actual, with no
reliable or conclusive evidence to support the existence of such plans.[182] Such a
theory also contradicts other statements in Sobibór where Polish Jews
who were ‘resettled’ by the Nazis were able to return to Poland from the Soviet
Union.[183]
To support their belief in massive Soviet deportations of
Jews to Siberia in the late 1940s Graf quotes the 1950 American Jewish
Yearbook, seemingly as an ultimate proof of their occurrence, as he does
not source any other evidence.[184] The
Yearbook merely relayed information on the deportations as reported by some
Jewish organizations in Eastern Europe. The American Jewish League against
Communism (AJLAC) for instance, as quoted by Graf in the Yearbook, estimated
the number of Jewish deportees at 400,000. However, Graf leaves out crucial but
(for him) inconvenient pieces of information in his quote of the Yearbook.
First, the Yearbook reported that the American Committee of Jewish Writers,
Artists, and Scientists described the AJLAC’s estimate on the deportations as
“fantastic” and “without foundation.” Also, Graf doesn’t disclose the fact that
the Yearbook itself declared that, “At the time of writing it was impossible to
ascertain with any degree of certitude to what extent the reports (of Soviet
deportations of Jews) were true.”[185] Such a
statement, of course, severely undermines MGK’s reliance upon the publication
as proof of such deportations.
One of the foremost researchers of Stalin’s era
antisemitism Gennady Kostyrchenko writes about these deportation rumours:
The scale of rumours about impending mass deportation of Jews by the authorities increased significantly during the anti-cosmopolitan campaign to such an extent that that foreign press began mentioning this. On the pages of Jewish publications (especially in Israel, USA and UK) during the 1949-1952 period there were numerous reports about either an alleged decision taken by the Soviet authorities to deport the entire Jewish population of the country to Siberia, or about the completed resettlement of 400 thousand Jews from Russia to Siberia, or of the prepared deportation in the same direction of another 1 million Jews from the Ukraine and Belorussia. The appearance of such information in the Western press was largely due to the latent propaganda pressure, which since the end of 1949 the Israeli leaders began exerting towards the USSR, seeking thereby to induce Stalin to meet their requirements to allow the mass emigration of Jews from the USSR. Particularly insistent in this case was the Israeli Foreign Minister M. Sharett. On October 5 he was informed by the ambassador to the USSR Namir that Soviet Jews "live in fear and lack confidence in tomorrow" and "many" of them "fear deportation from Moscow is about to begin". Ten days later Sharett replied with a coded telegram sent to Moscow, which contained the following statement:
"We should start a campaign in the international Jewish press, especially in the U.S., as well as in non-Jewish press on the issue of the Soviet Jewry, allowing the leaks to the press of all the correct information at our disposal, as well as rumours."
And although later the same Namir, as well as a director of East European Department of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Israel A. Levavi repeatedly informed Sharett of the unfounded nature of the rumours about the preparation of the deportation of Soviet Jews, publications about it in the Western press did not stop.[186]
While deportations did occur in the Soviet Union during
the late 1940s, they are nothing like MGK make them out to be. Instead of an
effort to hide Polish and western European Jews that were ‘resettled’ into the
occupied Soviet territories[187], the
deportations were organized against perceived opponents of the state, with the
deportees being sent to special settlements in the eastern Soviet Union. One of
the regions most targeted during these deportations was the Baltic, perhaps the
most popular destination for the Nazi ‘resettlement’ of Jews (as described by
MGK). According to Soviet documents however, some 139,604 persons were
relocated from the Baltic countries throughout the late 1940s.[188] This
figure is obviously dwarfed by the alleged hundreds of thousands of Jewish
resettlers sent to this region according to Kues.[189] Nor do
Soviet documents relate any focus or emphasis regarding Jewish persons to be
removed during the deportations, as they instead targeted nationalist and
anti-communist elements. One must conclude, therefore, that no Jews ‘resettled’
by the Nazis in the Baltic countries were deported by the Soviet Union.
A similar conclusion can also be drawn regarding
Belorussia and the Ukraine, two other suggested destination of Nazi
resettlement. Most of the Soviet deportations from western Ukraine occurred
prior to 1948, with those operations launched between 1944 and 1946 largely
focused against anti-communist guerrillas (nearly 37,000 such persons). In 1947,
while targeting “nationalist and bandit families” in Ukraine, the Soviets
deported nearly 78,000 people.[190] Up until 1955, a decade after the end of the
Second World War, a total of 203,662 persons (kulaks and “bandit accomplices”)
had been deported from the Ukraine[191], a
fact which clearly does not square with MGK’s thesis that hundreds of thousands
of resettled Jews were deported to Siberia from Ukraine. While Belorussia
produced the largest number of “voluntary” resettlers in 1946 to occupy newly
acquired Kaliningrad, there does not appear to have been any substantial amount
of deportation of peoples from the country in the immediate postwar years.[192]
The largest hole in MGK’s thesis is the absolute lack of
evidence to support the existence of such concentration camps for the
‘resettled’ Jews. They are unable to cite a single witness or document to
support their speculation. While MGK might object that none of the two million
‘resettled’ Jews were able to present such an account, this does
not save MGK's fantastic scenario. The continued
presence of Jews in camps would generate even more information than their
supposed initial liberation. It is sometimes said that absence of evidence is
not evidence of absence. But this rule is only applicable when we can't expect
presence of evidence. This is clearly not the case here. We would expect
literal tons of documents about these Jews in numerous archives spread
throughout the Soviet republics – the documents which were impossible to
eliminate or hide completely, as numerous other cases (like Katyn) demonstrate.
The number of various agencies and people that would be involved at one time or
another is mind-boggling. Aside from official documents, we would expect at
least some mentions of the issue in memoirs and interviews of former Soviet
officials – Politburo members, security officers, railway workers, guards – all
the thousands of people that would have been involved in such an utterly
impossible cover-up as well as their relatives and friends.
We would also expect an enormous
rumor trail. We know from the camp memoirs such as Solzhenitsyn's The GULAG
Archipelago that information (even information that ordinary citizens and
prisoners were not supposed to know) spread far and wide. Like a stone thrown
into water causes circles to spread, so such a massive event as a deportation
and continuous confinement of foreign Jews would cause ripples of rumours that
would sooner or later reach dissidents and Samizdat.
Finally, the supposed imprisonment
of Jews doesn't even begin to solve MGK's problem. Stalin died in 1953, leading
to the Thaw and to the partial exposure of Stalin's crimes, as well as to
liberation of numerous GULAG inmates and deported groups. At this point in time
it is utterly ridiculous to suggest that Khrushchev wouldn't let the Jews out
of this imaginary imprisonment and wouldn't use this information to further
condemn Stalin. Yet we see not even a trace of discussion of this issue in
numerous volumes of declassified documents on the rehabilitation era.
This line of argument can be
continued (consider, for example, that it would be impossible to hide this mass
of people from foreign intelligence services), but by now we hope that the
reader sees that MGK are completely divorced from reality in suggesting such a
scenario. We will only reiterate that whatever documents there are directly
refute MGK, as has been already shown above. Case in point is the statistics of
the special settlements.
The "special settlers" - spetspereselentsy or spetsposelentsy,
was a special category of repressed groups of people. These special settlers
were exiled from their homes and lands into faraway regions of USSR as
punishment for alleged misdeeds. The decision was taken not by courts, but by
Stalin. The mass deportations began with the so-called "kulaks",
then, since mid-1930s, people began to be deported according to ethnic category
as well. All the deported peoples, such as Chechens and Ingushs, Koreans,
Germans and many others were classified as "special settlers". Deportation
of ethnic groups became an established procedure and therefore we know that if
Jews were to be ever deported en masse, they would have figured in the
secret "special settlements" statistics.
The issue of "special settlements" has been studied at length
by historians on the basis of archival documents. Works by Zemskov, Bugai,
Polian and others reconstructed the full picture of the deportations and
presented statistical information about the deportees.[193]
The totality of documentary evidence completely refutes the notion of Soviet
mass deportation of surviving foreign Jews to unknown destinations in USSR and thus,
automatically, destroys the "transit camp" thesis.
It should be
noted that Stalin was not averse to deporting peaceful foreign citizens as a
matter of principle. In 1940-41, he deported approximately
315,000 people from eastern Poland in four sets of deportations.[194] Around
80,000 former Polish citizens who escaped from the Nazis (more than
60,000 of them - Jewish) were sent to work mostly in People's Commissariat of
Forestry special settlements. They were amnestied in August 1941. The Soviets
documented both the deportation and subsequent results.[195]
After the amnesty of former Polish citizens, the number of Jews among
the special settlers was always insubstantial. There was no separate category
for Jewish special settlers (like there were categories for Germans, Greeks,
Chechens, etc.). The Jewish spetsposelentsy always fell under other
categories, such as people resettled from the Western parts of Ukraine and
Belorussia, people resettled from Moldavia, etc. However the Soviet authorities
also kept count of ethnicities, so we can also ascertain that there weren't
hundreds of thousands Jews hidden under other labels.
According to MVD SSSR memo issued in January 1953, on January 1, 1953,
there were 2,753,356 special settlers, among them 1,810,140 adults (17 years
old and older). Among these adults there were 5168 Jews.[196]
In January 1955 among 1,690,049 special settlers there were 4547 Jews.[197] In
1958 among 145,968 special settlers there were 1054 Jews.[198]
The presence of hundreds of thousands of foreign Jews among the special
settlers can also be excluded because we have the data on how many foreigners
were resettled. In October of 1951 there were 17,285 citizens of other states
or people without citizenship among the special settlers (most of them - Greek
citizens), while in January 1953 there were 28,388 foreigners (most of them
Greeks).[199]
Moreover, the number of special settlers began to decrease in mid-1950s
as the Thaw began - on January 1, 1956 there were 904,439 special settlers, on
July 1, 1956 - 611,912, on January 1, 1957 - 211,408, on July 1, 1957 - 178,363
(mostly "anti-Soviet" contingent like OUN members).[200]
To give the illustration of what real deported groups were among the
special settlers it is sufficient to present a couple of tables excerpted from
the original summary documents (of which the many are available for different
years). The first one gives the statistics of the special settlers from January
1 to April 1, 1945[201]:
Category
|
On 01.01.1945
|
On 01.04.1945
|
Chechens
and Ingushs
|
440,544
|
433,394
|
Karachays
|
63,477
|
62,529
|
Balkars
|
35,839
|
35,106
|
Kalmyks
|
83,981
|
82,397
|
From
Crimea
|
208,828
|
204,502
|
Ssylnoposelentsy (exiles)
|
44,222
|
43,787
|
Germans
|
496,811
|
503,411
|
Mobilized
Germans
|
105,268
|
114,998
|
Former
kulaks
|
631,173
|
622,062
|
From
Georgia
|
91,986
|
90,538
|
OUN
members
|
12,490
|
16,200
|
Volksdeutsche
|
913
|
1,071
|
German
collaborators
|
782
|
766
|
"True
Orthodox Christians" sect
|
1405
|
1365
|
Total:
|
2,217,719
|
2,212,126
|
The second one gives similar
statistics for January 1, 1953[202]:
Category
|
No. of people
|
1.
GERMANS
|
1,224,931
|
evicted
|
855,674
|
repatriated
|
208,388
|
local
|
111,324
|
mobilized
|
48,582
|
others
|
963
|
2. FROM
NORTH CAUCASUS
|
498,452
|
Chechens
|
316,717
|
Ingushs
|
83,518
|
Karachays
|
63,327
|
Balkars
|
33,214
|
others
|
1,676
|
3. FROM
CRIMEA
|
204,698
|
Tatars
|
165,259
|
Greeks
|
14,760
|
Bulgarians
|
12,465
|
Armenians
|
8,570
|
others
|
3,644
|
4. OUN
MEMBERS
|
175,063
|
5. FROM
BALTICS IN 1945-1949
|
139,957
|
Lithuanians
|
81,158
|
Latvians
|
39,279
|
Estonians
|
19,520
|
6. FROM
GEORGIA
|
86,663
|
Turks
|
46,790
|
Kurds
|
8,843
|
Hemshins
|
1,397
|
others
|
29,633
|
7.
KALMYKS
|
81,475
|
8. FROM
BLACK SEA COAST IN 1949
|
57,142
|
Greeks
|
37,352
|
"Dashnaks"
|
15,486
|
Turks
|
1,794
|
others
|
2,510
|
9.
VLASOVITES
|
56,746
|
10. POLES
EVICTED IN 1936
|
36,045
|
11. FROM
MOLDAVIA IN 1949
|
35,838
|
12.
ACCORDING TO ORDER FROM 02.06.1948
|
27,275
|
13.
FORMER KULAKS
|
24,686
|
14.
KULAKS FROM LITHUANIA IN 1951
|
18,104
|
15. FROM
BALTICS IN 1940-1941
|
14,301
|
16. FROM
GEORGIA IN 1951-1952
|
11,685
|
17. FROM
MOLDAVIA IN 1940-1941
|
9,793
|
18.
JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES
|
9,363
|
19. FROM
KRASNODAR KRAI AND ROSTOV OBLAST IN 1942
|
6,057
|
20. FROM
WESTERN REGIONS OF USSR AND BSSR IN 1940-1941
|
5,592
|
21.
VOLKSDEUTSCHE AND GERMAN COLLABORATORS
|
4,834
|
22.
IRANIANS
|
4,707
|
23.
ANDERS ARMY MEMBERS
|
4,520
|
24.
KULAKS FROM WEST BELORUSSIA IN 1952
|
4,431
|
25.
BASMACHI
|
2,747
|
26.
KABARDAY
|
1,717
|
27.
KULAKS FROM WEST UKRAINE IN 1951
|
1,445
|
28. FROM
PSKOV OBLAST IN 1950
|
1,356
|
29.
KULAKS FROM IZMAIL OBLAST IN 1948
|
1,157
|
30.
"TRUE ORTHODOX CHRISTIANS" (IPKh)
|
995
|
31. FROM
IRANIAN AND AFGHAN BORDERS IN 1937
|
916
|
32.
ACCORDING TO ORDER FROM 23.07.1951
|
591
|
33.
INTERNED FROM THE TERRITORY OF POLAND
|
74
|
TOTAL:
|
2,753,356
|
These and many other documents demonstrate how exhaustive is the Soviet
documentation for various deported groups and people. Not a single sign of the
allegedly resettled Jews can be found among this mass of documents.
Of course, when cornered, the deniers may claim that for some reason the
resettled Jews weren't designated as "special settlers" and were sent
not to special settlements but to GULAG camps. This "hypothesis"
doesn't pass the smell test, since the Soviet modus operandi in regard
to deported peoples is quite clear from the historical record and there is no
reason to suppose that the Jews would constitute a separate case. However let
us close this final loophole. First of all, here's the summary statistics for
GULAG camps, colonies and prisons of USSR for January 1 of each year from 1943
to 1960[203]:
Year
|
Inmates in camps
|
Inmates in colonies
|
Inmates in prisons
|
Total number of inmates:
|
1943
|
983,974
|
500,208
|
237,534
|
1,721,716
|
1944
|
663,594
|
516,225
|
151,296
|
1,331,115
|
1945
|
715,506
|
745,171
|
275,510
|
1,736,187
|
1946
|
600,897
|
509,696
|
245,146
|
1,355,739
|
1947
|
808,839
|
894,667
|
293,135
|
1,996,641
|
1948
|
1,108,057
|
1,061,195
|
280,374
|
2,449,626
|
1949
|
1,216,361
|
1,140,324
|
231,047
|
2,587,732
|
1950
|
1,416,300
|
1,145,051
|
198,744
|
2,760,095
|
1951
|
1,543,382
|
997,378
|
164,679
|
2,705,439
|
1952
|
1,713,614
|
796,174
|
152,614
|
2,662,402
|
1953
|
1,731,693
|
740,554
|
152,290
|
2,624,537
|
1954
|
884,040
|
440,963
|
149,082
|
1,474,085
|
1955
|
748,489
|
326,791
|
98,574
|
1,173,854
|
1956
|
557,877
|
223,753
|
143,509
|
925,139
|
1957
|
492,092
|
315,885
|
139,456
|
947,433
|
1958
|
409,567
|
312,332
|
118,704
|
840,603
|
1959
|
388,114
|
474,593
|
160,893
|
1,023,600
|
1960
|
276,279
|
306,438
|
71,084
|
653,801
|
These numbers clearly cannot support continued presence of many hundreds
of thousands of foreign Jews in Soviet detention locations. Moreover, the data
about the ethnicity of GULAG inmates is also available. Here's the statistics
for January 1, 1951[204]:
Ethnicity
|
Inmates in camps
|
Inmates in colonies
|
Total
|
Russians
|
805,995
|
599,516
|
1,405,511
|
Ukrainians
|
362,643
|
143,578
|
506,221
|
Belorussians
|
63,863
|
32,608
|
96,471
|
Azerbaijani
|
6,703
|
17,001
|
23,704
|
Georgians
|
6,968
|
16,615
|
23,583
|
Armenians
|
12,029
|
14,735
|
26,764
|
Turkmens
|
2,257
|
3,086
|
5,343
|
Uzbeks
|
14,137
|
15,892
|
30,029
|
Tajiks
|
2,884
|
2,842
|
5,726
|
Kazakhs
|
12,554
|
13,352
|
25,906
|
Kyrgyzs
|
3,628
|
2,796
|
6,424
|
Finns and Karelians
|
2,369
|
1,925
|
4,294
|
Moldavians
|
16,008
|
6,717
|
22,725
|
Lithuanians
|
35,773
|
7,243
|
43,016
|
Latvians
|
21,689
|
6,831
|
28,520
|
Estonians
|
18,185
|
6,433
|
24,618
|
Tatars
|
28,532
|
28,396
|
56,928
|
Bashkirs
|
3,619
|
4,228
|
7,847
|
Udmurts
|
2,993
|
2,472
|
5,465
|
Jews
|
14,374
|
11,051
|
25,425
|
Germans
|
21,096
|
11,173
|
32,269
|
Poles
|
19,184
|
4,343
|
23,527
|
Romanians
|
1,318
|
321
|
1,639
|
Iranians
|
262
|
344
|
606
|
Afghans
|
100
|
31
|
131
|
Mongols
|
70
|
13
|
83
|
Chinese
|
1,781
|
258
|
2,039
|
Japanese
|
852
|
250
|
1,102
|
Koreans
|
1,692
|
820
|
2,512
|
Greeks
|
1,558
|
768
|
2,326
|
Turks
|
300
|
62
|
362
|
Others, of them:
|
48,351
|
38,679
|
87,030
|
native to USSR
|
41,688
|
37,144
|
78,832
|
non-native
|
6,663
|
1,535
|
8,198
|
Total:
|
1,533,767
|
994,379
|
2,528,146
|
And for completeness sake, in January 1942 there were 23164 Jews in
GULAG, in January 1943 - 20230, in January 1944 - 15317, in January 1945 -
14433, in January 1946 - 10839, in January 1947 - 9530 (with the data for 1946
and 1947 being incomplete).[205]
MGK’s theory is thus categorically refuted
through each step of its expected evidentiary chain: instead of discovering two
million ‘resettled’ Jews, the Red Army reported only of its discoveries of the
death camps[206];
instead of those ‘resettled’ Jews being deported by the Soviet Union, a much
smaller amount of deportations took place in the years after the war and were
not anti-Jewish in their aim. Such a specious explanation, proposed without
evidence and obviously conjured up on a whim by MGK to explain the
disappearance and silence of supposed ‘resettled’ Jews, is a classic
illustration of why Holocaust Revisionism is actually a form of pseudohistory.
It also forces MGK to delineate the workings of a “hoax,” for although the term
is avoided by MGK in their works, they do argue for a conspiracy between the
Soviet Union and (unnamed) Zionist leaders to cover up the fate of the
‘resettled’ Jews.[207] Such a
fantastic theory is not sourced to any piece of evidence, and can thus be
safely discarded until such is provided.
[180] See Graf, ‘Insights on the 1944 Deportations of Hungarian Jews’; cf.
Aly/Heim, Vordenker der Vernichtung, p.285.
[181] MGK, Sobibór, p.373.
[182] G. V. Kostyrchenko,
Tajnaya politika Stalina, 2003, pp. 671-685; “Deportatsiya –
mistifikatsiya” in Lekhaim, 2002, no. 9 (125), http://www.lechaim.ru/ARHIV/125/kost.htm; also see his review of Brent and
Naumov’s book about the Doctors’ plot – “Mezhdu mifom in naukoj”, Lekhaim,
2004, no. 10 (50), http://www.lechaim.ru/ARHIV/150/n2.htm.
[183] MGK, Sobibór, p.355: “Thus it is most likely that the
returnees were part of the Jews who had been moved to the eastern areas by the
Germans three or four years earlier.” More accurate information on the
repatriations can be found in Jonathan Harrison, ‘The Crazy World of Walter
Sanning (Part 6),’ Holocaust Controversies, 7.10.07, http://holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.com/2007/10/crazy-world-of-walter-sanning-part-6.html.
[184] MGK, Sobibór, p.356.
[185] American Jewish Yearbook, 51, 1950, p.340.
[187] MGK, Sobibór, pp.356-357, p.373.
[188] Nikolaĭ Fedorovich
Bugai, The Deportation of Peoples in the Soviet Union. New York: Nova
Science, 1996, p.166.
[189] Kues, ‘Evidence’, Part II, see sections ‘Partial List of Camps with
Jewish detainees in Lithuania’ and 3.4.
[190] Alexander Statiev, The Soviet Counterinsurgency in the Western
Borderlands, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010, p.178.
[191] Ibid., p.190.
[192] Pavel Polian, Against Their Will: The History and
Geography of Forced Migrations in the USSR. New York: Centraul European
University Press, 2004, p.163.
[193] V. N. Zemskov, Spetsposelentsy v
SSSR, 1930-1960, Moscow, Nauka, 2003; works by N. F. Bugai are too numerous
to list, but of special interest to us is his article about the deportations of
Jews in USSR: N. F. Bugai, "Pereseleniya i deportatsii evreyskogo
naseleniya v SSSR", Otechestvennaya istoriya, 1993, no. 4, p. 184;
P. M. Polian, Ne po svoey vole..., Moscow, O.G.I.-Memorial, 2001,
available at http://demoscope.ru/weekly/knigi/polian/polian.html; T. V. Tsarevskaya-Dyakina (ed.), Spetspereselentsy
v SSSR, vol. 5 of Istoriya Stalinskogo GULAGa series, Moscow,
ROSSPEN, 2004.
[194] Aleksander Gurjanov, ‘Cztery deportacje 1940–1941 (Four
deportations 1940-1941)’, KARTA, 12, 1994, pp. 114–136
[195] Zemskov,
op. cit., pp. 84-90, 97; Mordechai Altshuler, Soviet
Jewry on the Eve of the Holocaust, New York, 1998, pp.325-326; N.S.Lebedeva,
Katyn. Mart 1940 - sentyabr' 2000; Moscow, "Ves' mir", Rasstrel.
Sud'by zhivykh. Ekho Katyn, 2001, document 184; GARF 9401-2-64, pp. 381-384.
[197] Ibid., p. 239.
[198] Bugai, op. cit., p. 184.
[199] Zemskov, op. cit., p. 184.
[200] Ibid., pp. 256-260.
[201] Ibid., p. 119. We give only an
excerpt of a more complete table which includes deaths, escapes, arrivals,
releases, etc.
[203] V. N. Zemskov, "Demografiya
zaklyuchyonnykh, spetsposelentsev i ssylnykh (30-50-ye gody)", Mir
Rossii, 1999, vol. VIII, no. 4, p. 115. Cf. J. A. Getty, G. T. Rittersporn,
V. N. Zemskov, "Victims of the Soviet penal system in the pre-war years: a
first approach on the basis of archival evidence", The American
Historical Review, 1993, vol. 98, no. 4, pp. 1048-1049.
[204] V. N. Zemskov, "GULAG
(istoriko-sotsiologicheskiy aspekt)", Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya,
1991, no. 7, p. 9.
[205] V. N. Zemskov, "GULAG
(istoriko-sotsiologicheskiy aspekt)", Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya,
1991, no. 6, p. 26. The author notes that for 01.01.1946 the data about
ethnicities of 145,974 inmates is lacking, and for 01.01.1947 the data for
22,398 inmates is lacking. It is clear, however, that this incompleteness
doesn't help the deniers.
[206] Cf. Sergey Romanov’s multi-part series, ‘What the Soviets knew
about Auschwitz-and when,’ Holocaust Controversies, http://holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.com/2006/04/quick-links.html#sovau
[207] MGK, Sobibór, p.373.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please read our Comments Policy