There is literally nothing that the denier's "Holocaust Encyclopedia" does not get wrong in the entry "Burmeister, Walter".
Starting with the identity:
"Walter Burmeister (14 Nov. 1894 – 23 Feb. 1980), SS Oberscharführer"
Walter Burmeister born 14 November 1894 was a school teacher / inspector and not member of the Nazi paramilitary forces. He had no involvement with Kulmhof / Chełmno extermination camp.
Denazification file of Walter Burmeister (born 14 November 1894), LA-NRW Abteilung Rheinland, NW 1039-B/3939 |
The Walter Burmeister associated with Kulmhof was born on 2 May 1906. This mistaken identity has been plagiarized from a Wikipedia entry that erroneously combined the biographies of two Burmeisters. The notion that a school inspector would be drafted to drive a gas van should raise immediate red flags.
The claim that Burmeister was "interrogated by Investigating Judge Władysław Bednarz after the war in Poland" and that he "made up when put under pressure by his Polish investigators to come up with something" is absurd. Burmeister was never captured and interrogated by the Poles. It is also incorrect to assert "there is no trace of any Renault truck ever used as a gas van". Evidence (little, but there is) including Burmeister's testimony might indicate that Renault chassis were part of the gas van pool. See Rebuttal of Alvarez of Gas Vans: Misreading the Fine Print for further reading.
The argument that there is no trace of the "fanciful piping system" is also wrong. The pipe system in the gas vans, used to feed in the gasoline engine exhaust, is well-established and supported by numerous eyewitness accounts. For instance:
"We looked inside the gas van and noticed that under the wooden floor grid, there were thin pipes running through, which were perforated."(interrogation of Walter Bock on May 16, 1961, LAS, Abt. 353.3, Nr. 16510)
It is anchronistic to say that "15 years later in Germany...Burmeister had learned enough about the orthodox narrative to adjust it to what was expected of him". In reality, the testimony where he supposedly "adjusted" to "what was expected of him" was provided before the testimony discussed previously. It is misleading to say he was "no longer claiming a Renault", as in the testimony he mentioned that the gas vans were "French vehicles".
Finally, Burmeister was not trialed for "for aiding in the murder of at least 130,000 people" but actually 145,000 (first period of Kulmhof extermination camp) + 7,100 (2nd period of Kulmhof extermination camp) people - thus 152,100 in total (Justiz und NS-Verbrechen, Lfd.Nr.594a LG Bonn 23.07.1965 JuNSV Bd.XXI S.227)
Lessons learnt:
1. Be cautios with Wikipedia
2. Hands off denier's "Holocaust Encyclopedia"
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteHi i'm not a holocaust denier, but could you make a refutation of this website? i'm too lazy to dig through it myself. Much appreciated the work youre doing
ReplyDeletehttps://www.holocaust.claims/auschwitz-birkenau/open-air-cremations-in-auschwitz-birkenau/
https://www.holocaust.claims/general/the-return-of-mot/
https://www.holocaust.claims/auschwitz-birkenau/210-square-meters/
https://www.holocaust.claims/auschwitz-birkenau/wooden-doors-2/
Don't have time to page through the archives of this blog for the other ones right now, but on the 210 square meters one -- the number of people in the Tokyo subway at rush hour is regularly around 6 people per square meter, so 1,000 in 210 square meters is certainly possible. If you take into account that many people being pushed into gas chambers had been on starvation rations (and thus were thin) and that roughly one-quarter were children, it becomes even easier.
DeleteThanks a lot. I found some refutations for the rest on here.
DeleteDamn that holocaust claims website pisses me off. The woman running it has barely any of her own sources and uses the CODOH Encyclopaedia. I even emailed them to troll them and to see how stupid they would be. They sent a couple neo nazis emailing me asking for a detailed Holocaust timeline and evidence of mass graves etc. Utterly despicable website
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteHi Serozha!
ReplyDeleteCan you refute plz the channel "плохой сигнал"?
He is a tankie and Katyn denier.
I'm on it.
DeleteHello I enjoy your web site and all of the historical informal things you provide. Do you have a email. I may want to reference you in a research paper I am writing. A reply would be greatly appreciated thank you.
ReplyDeleteit would be great if you could debunk some of Holocaust claims ludicrous ideas
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteHi chaps
ReplyDeletebig fan
Is there any chance you could refute the Holocaust.claims website. Me and the lady who runs it are having a little spat over if the Holocaust is real or not. She asked me for evidence of its reality. I pointed her over to this wonderful blog. She sent me the 'rebuttal' by Mattogno. I promptly sent her the debunking of that MGK book. But she refuses to listen, and sent a couple of neo nazis over to email me interrogating me on the factuality of Mass Graves, Gas Chambers etc. I feel like she needs a good debunking.
Best of Luck
Has this book from Mattogno been refuted yet?
ReplyDeletehttps://holocausthandbooks.com/book/concentration-camp-majdanek/