"Volume 28 in the Holocaust Handbook Series, 'The “Extermination Camps” of “Aktion Reinhardt” - An Analysis and Refutation of Factitious “Evidence,” Deceptions and Flawed Argumentation of the “Holocaust Controversies” Bloggers' is a point-by-point technical deconstruction of the .pdf 'Bełżec, Sobibór, Treblinka: Holocaust Denial and Operation Reinhard, A Critique of the Falsehoods of Mattogno, Graf and Kues' released by the "Holocaust Controversies" bloggers Jonathan Harrison, Roberto Muehlenkamp, Jason Myers, Sergey Romanov & Nicholas Terry. These people are mostly referred to in the text by Graf, Kues & Mattogno as the "plagiarist bloggers"--and with very good reason: a sizeable chunk of the books 1554 pages are dedicated to demonstrating their brazen plagiarisms, as well as their outright lies, distortions and opportunistically selective quotations from hundreds of books they have clearly never seen, whilst rarely giving credit to anyone, least of all revisionists. Indeed in many places, these thoroughly dishonest cretins accuse Graf, Kues & Mattogno of the very opposite of what their published works actually say--whilst misquoting from the very books they are criticising as evidence of their claims! It is almost beyond belief that supposedly intelligent people could be quite so dishonest in public; clearly they think that anyone reading their "work" will take their word at face value and never independently check anything for themselves. What scholarship! Able to appeal only to the lowest common denominator, but even then they can make a "case" only by plumbing the depths of intellectual dishonesty.
That these "plagiarist bloggers" are loathed by orthodox "holocaust" websites--for instance, the ARC website says about them: “Unauthorized links to our website from the controversial and grossly inaccurate hate blog postings of the following persons: Roberto Muehlenkamp – Sergey Romanov – Dr. Nick Terry, [a]re not condoned by ARC. We maintain no connection to Holocaust hate blogs, and would caution all to avoid being misled by these individuals.”--did not stop them from arrogantly taking to task many orthodox scholars as well as Graf, Kues & Mattogno (referred to by the plagiarists as MGK) on subjects they clearly are in total ignorance of. The results are there for all to see.
It is easy to see why orthodox scholars hate these fundamentalist zealots, and for the same reasons revisionists should love them. Clearly of low intellectual capacity, they have in one fell swoop put back on the table all of the arguments that orthodox scholars had managed to effectively sweep under the carpet, whilst at the same time giving revisionist scholars ample opportunities to prove to any person with eyes and the ability to read just how intellectually bankrupt the orthodox position on the "holocaust" really is. Naturally, these idiotic plagiarists arrive at the hackneyed conclusion that MGK are motivated by "anti-Semitism"; quelle surprise! If that really is so, then what does it say about the plagiarists that it is apparently necessary to be so totally dishonest in order to "refute" these "anti-Semites"? What does that make them, anti-reasonites...? Anti-thinkers? Or just contemptible and completely dishonest?
Recommended related reading: The plagiarist bloggers book is supposed to be a refutation of the books listed below. The best way to read the presently-reviewed work is to download these books (which are of course available for free download from the Holocaust Handbooks website), and compare what actually appears between their pages to that claimed by the dishonest plagiarists." https://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/customer-reviews/R1QHY3JP5MXVDP?ref=pf_vv_at_pdctrvw_srp
"Volume 28 in the Holocaust Handbook Series, 'The “Extermination Camps” of “Aktion Reinhardt” - An Analysis and Refutation of Factitious “Evidence,” Deceptions and Flawed Argumentation of the “Holocaust Controversies” Bloggers' is a point-by-point technical deconstruction of the .pdf 'Bełżec, Sobibór, Treblinka: Holocaust Denial and Operation Reinhard, A Critique of the Falsehoods of Mattogno, Graf and Kues' released by the "Holocaust Controversies" bloggers Jonathan Harrison, Roberto Muehlenkamp, Jason Myers, Sergey Romanov & Nicholas Terry. These people are mostly referred to in the text by Graf, Kues & Mattogno as the "plagiarist bloggers"--and with very good reason: a sizeable chunk of the books 1554 pages are dedicated to demonstrating their brazen plagiarisms, as well as their outright lies, distortions and opportunistically selective quotations from hundreds of books they have clearly never seen, whilst rarely giving credit to anyone, least of all revisionists. Indeed in many places, these thoroughly dishonest cretins accuse Graf, Kues & Mattogno of the very opposite of what their published works actually say--whilst misquoting from the very books they are criticising as evidence of their claims! It is almost beyond belief that supposedly intelligent people could be quite so dishonest in public; clearly they think that anyone reading their "work" will take their word at face value and never independently check anything for themselves. What scholarship! Able to appeal only to the lowest common denominator, but even then they can make a "case" only by plumbing the depths of intellectual dishonesty.
ReplyDeleteThat these "plagiarist bloggers" are loathed by orthodox "holocaust" websites--for instance, the ARC website says about them: “Unauthorized links to our website from the controversial and grossly inaccurate hate blog postings of the following persons: Roberto Muehlenkamp –
Sergey Romanov – Dr. Nick Terry, [a]re not condoned by ARC. We maintain no connection to Holocaust hate blogs, and would caution all to avoid being misled by these individuals.”--did not stop them from arrogantly taking to task many orthodox scholars as well as Graf, Kues & Mattogno (referred to by the plagiarists as MGK) on subjects they clearly are in total ignorance of. The results are there for all to see.
It is easy to see why orthodox scholars hate these fundamentalist zealots, and for the same reasons revisionists should love them. Clearly of low intellectual capacity, they have in one fell swoop put back on the table all of the arguments that orthodox scholars had managed to effectively sweep under the carpet, whilst at the same time giving revisionist scholars ample opportunities to prove to any person with eyes and the ability to read just how intellectually bankrupt the orthodox position on the "holocaust" really is. Naturally, these idiotic plagiarists arrive at the hackneyed conclusion that MGK are motivated by "anti-Semitism"; quelle surprise! If that really is so, then what does it say about the plagiarists that it is apparently necessary to be so totally dishonest in order to "refute" these "anti-Semites"? What does that make them, anti-reasonites...? Anti-thinkers? Or just contemptible and completely dishonest?
Recommended related reading:
The plagiarist bloggers book is supposed to be a refutation of the books listed below. The best way to read the presently-reviewed work is to download these books (which are of course available for free download from the Holocaust Handbooks website), and compare what actually appears between their pages to that claimed by the dishonest plagiarists."
https://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/customer-reviews/R1QHY3JP5MXVDP?ref=pf_vv_at_pdctrvw_srp