I've been "out of town" for about a week, so I didn't notice this discussion of the so-called Holocaust Cartoon contest at Respectful Insolence.
Even from the standpoint of denial, I think there were "better" cartoons, but the third place is the most pathetic of the "winners". Because ... why Faurisson? He's not the most prolific or influential denier out there. Perhaps because the author has only read Fauri's books?
And then again, even thinking within a denier "framework", the "myth" of the gas chambers is alive and well, so the third cartoon is factually false even from a denier point of view. Oh, well. An average denier is not known for brightness.