This weirdo is John Bryant, who apparently likes to think of himself as a great intellectual, and who thinks that it's soooo cooooool to be "politically incorrect".
Of course, no true intellectual can dismiss simple accuracy. But here's an excerpt from Bryant's exchange with Andrew:
First you miss the main point that it establishes a series of events which shows an unbroken pattern of Jewish perfidy, and second, you miss the point that most of the small details you question are unimportant. The end of the Russo-Japenese war is a perfect example -- WHO THE HELL CARES whether it was 1905 or 1906???? A professional historian would want to get it right, but I am not a professional historian, and my audience doesn't give a damn.So, he has just shown that he has no regard for truth. He keeps proving it further:
A more serious case is Stalin: Does his name mean 'son of a Jew'? Well, maybe not -- maybe it means 'son of a Hebrew' or 'Son of Israel'? Are you really fluent enuf in Georgian to say? Did your girlfriend teach you Georgian in between blowjobs? I didn't think so. But really, it is a small point, because Stalin was surrounded by Jews -- he had Jewish wives, his main man was a Jew (Kaganovich), and the movement he headed was infested to the max with Jews. So if he weren't Jewish, he was still a Jew by osmosis, so to speak.Does "Bryant" mean "bird shit mixed with snot"? Well, maybe not, maybe it means "a brainless dolt with too much free time on his hands"?
Note how this idiot tries to shift the burden of proof on Andrew. His "maybes" don't count, of course - he has no evidence whatsoever that "Dzhugashvili" has anything to do with Jews (in fact, "Dzhuga" is meaningless in Georgian; thus "Dzhugashvili" means "son of Dzhuga", no more and no less; cf. A. V. Ostrovskij, "Predki Stalina", Genealogicheskij vestnik, 2001, no. 1). Both of Stalin's wives were non-Jewish - Yekaterina Svanidze was Georgian, Nadezhda Alliluyeva - half-Russian, half-Georgian. Neither was Stalin "surrounded by Jews" when he finally acquired the absolute power - he murdered most of the leading Jewish (and non-Jewish) Bolsheviks after several show trials. Kaganovich was indeed very close to Stalin until the late 1940s, and not because he was Jewish, but rather because he was a total sycophant, as his published correspondence with Stalin shows (Stalin i Kaganovich. Perepiska. 1931-1936, ROSSPEN, 2001, 798 pp.).
Indeed, here's what a Russian neo-Nazi "historian" Oleg Platonov (who was on the Editorial Advisory Committee of JHR, no less!) writes about Stalin in his Encyclopedic dictionary of Russian civilization:
Stalin Iosif Vissarionovich [...], Georgian Bolshevik. Since late 1930-s - a Russian statesman, military leader of the Russian people during the Great Patriotic War.Platonov goes on to praise Stalin by using such pearls as:
Stalin's life consists of two mutually exclusive stages. In the first stage - late XIX century - 1st half of 1930s - Stalin is the active accomplice of the criminal activities of Lenin and the so-called Lenin's guard, Jewish Bolsheviks, who exterminated millions of Russian people; in the second stage, since the 2nd half of 1930s - a Russian statesman, through whose efforts, in effect, the national revolution was accomplished, which overthrew the power of the Jewish Bolsheviks, and significantly (although not completely) resurrected the former role of the Russian people.
Stalin loved old Russian songs and often sang them. In contrast to Jewish Bolsheviks, general secretary of VKP(b) could not tolerate sexual scenes in movies. They jarred and revolted him.
In 1930-40s under Stalin's leadership no less than 800 thousand of Jewish Bolsheviks were exterminated - the cream of the Judaic anti-Russian organization, who wanted to transform Russia into a Jewish state. Almost all Jewish leaders were destroyed, and chances of the rest for acquiring of the power were reduced to a minimum.(The statistics is completely bogus, of course.)
Etc., etc., etc. A rabid fascist and antisemite (e.g. he promotes the Blood Libel and Holocaust denial literature) Platonov wouldn't praise "Jewish Stalin".
So was Stalin a "Jew by osmosis", or was he a great "liberator from the Jews"? Just as with so many other subjects (e.g., was Christianity a Jewish invention, aimed at naive gentiles with a goal to destroy their native religions; or is it really the only true safeguard against the Jews? Or: was Fanny Kaplan an evil Zionist who shot our great Russian leader Vladimir Lenin; or was this perfidious Jew Lenin really shot not by Kaplan, but by a brave unnamed Russian woman?), let antisemites quarrel about this among themselves. And if they decide to cut each other a lil' bit in the process - so much the better.
PS: The Birdbum, rightly afraid of more spanking, declares he won't respond: "It is really too silly to respond to" (a usual excuse of the vanquished).