Certain Patrick H. McNally from Tokyo (his e-mails patrick@fps.chuo-u.ac.jp and tkuh50@tku.ac.jp betray connections with Tokyo Keizai University and Chuo University - apparently an educated individual) is an ignoramus extraordinaire who denies the Holocaust, hates the Jews, etc. - well, the usual story. It is extremely easy to demonstrate that he is unqualified for any serious discussion of the Holocaust history. For example, he writes:
Welcome to hoaxoco$t arithmetic! With this massive reduction in the Awshucks total shouldn't the whole hoaxoco$t total be reduced? Not with the holyhoax where: 6,000,000 - 3,000,000 = 6,000,000.Well, no, the Auschwitz plaque never said that all 4,000,000 were the Jews, and 4,000,000 "Jewish Auschwitz victims" never figured in any Holocaust death toll breakdowns. A person who claims that 2+2=5 is not fit for mathematical discussions, and so is the person peddling 4,000,000 myth is not fit for any serious discussion of the Holocaust.
Anyway, this McNally is not quite marginal in the "revisionist" movement. He has a page on Adelaide Institute website, and he is hailed in several CODOH threads. Jonnie "Hannover" Hargis even says that the pathetic article I linked to above is a "must read".
McNally deserves some kudos though. Unlike many deniers, he doesn't hide his attitude towards Jews. Below you will find his piece posted at Adelaide Institute mailing list.
The article speaks for itself, but two points need to be made. First of all, this is a good illustration of the "Cold War" mindset of most Western deniers. Note how McNally never doubts Robert Conquest's Ukrainian famine death toll estimate of 7 million (which later (non-Communist) research has shown to be exaggerated by several millions). He doubts the Holocaust only, he never extends his "skepticism" to the Communist crimes. Second, note how the usual pattern of the dehumanization of the Jews continues here. OK, here it goes.
From: patrick@fps.chuo-u.ac.jp
Judy Andreas and Other Jooish Gatekeepers
Ms. Andreas has served up another "limited hangout" damage control piece
in "Zionism is Nobody`s Friend." It is the tried and true technique
perfected by Numb Chumsky and other pseudo-leftist elite Joos who
frantically attempt to distract attention from the core racism of the vast
majority of Joos.
Judy Andreas indulges in the nonsense of blaming only Zionism for jooish
crimes. However, the persecution complex paranoia, the reptile racism, and
the political megalomania of Jews existed long before the word "Zionism"
was coined. This paranoia, racism, and megalomania reached its apex in the
anti-human Talmud teachings. Zionists, neocon artists, AIPAC traitors,
Kissinger sodomizers, and ADLers [American Defamation Leaguers] are
nothing but today`s transient manifestations of Jewdayism` centuries old
blasphemous bigotry and disgusting ignorance.
Moreover, Zionism was never a serious political option for elite Joos
themselves and only existed in the sense of the old Jewish joke: "What is
a Zionist? A shrewd Jew who wants to send stupid Joos to Palestine."
Today`s Israeli Joos are the riff-raff of world joory and simply sponge
off handouts sucked out of stupid Gentile governments by their sneakier
and shiftier co-tribalists living as treasonous fifth columns among the
politically naive cattle-goyim.
Joody Andreas lectures us: "It is a grave mistake to believe that all Jews
are Zionists." Just more nonsense from the impassioned authoress! The
average Solomon Sixpacker or Leonard Lunchboxer may not BE a Zionist but
he SUPPORTS virtually any and all zio-criminal behavior. Of course, not
all Jews are racists. Perhaps only c. 96%! You don`t think so? Then just
try talking about forensic evidence and the Hoaxoco$t! Jewdy Andreas
certainly never questions the Hoaxoco$t fairy tale in her piece and that
it the reason why she can be dismissed as a maudlin, handwringing jooish
gatekeeper. She regards the Hoaxoco$t as a true story and not as world
history`s filthiest blood libel and most successful political lie.
Most UAssA Joos will deny being Zionists but almost all of them will go
berserk and start spitting out the empty smears of "auntie-Semite," "anti-
Semenist," etc., when confronted with demands for hard forensic,
scientific evidence that 6,000,000 Joos went up in chimney smoke or
whatever their currently peddled execution fairy tale happens to be.
Unfortunately, in most European countries, Joos control the jewdiciary so
that hoaxoco$t doubters are not only libeled but regularly imprisoned.
Ms. Andreas ends her piece with the purple patchy exhortation, "My dear
readers, Zionism will not protect you. Zionism will crucify you on a
bloodly cross of avarice. It is only through a union of Jewish, Christians
and Muslims that we will be able to take back out planet." This indicates
that the piece is addressed exclusively to Joos and is of no direct
concern to humans, whom the Talmud dismisses as "Gentile cattle-goyim." My
only interest is to urge humans against any alliance, cooperation, or even
discussion with Joos who accept the Hoaxoco$t fabrication.
Early in the Edo Period, the Japanese were trying to root out Christianity
because they had learned about the role of Spanish Catholics in
undermining and conquering the native governments in the Phillipines. To
test whether a person was a Christian, the Japanese introduced the
practice of "fumie" [a copper plate with a crucifix to be trodden on to
prove that a person was not a Christian]. Or let us imitate the Jewish
practice of spitting on Christian churches and cemeteries! Or even
urinating on an image symbolizing the Hoaxoco$t! Trampling, expectorating,
or urinating on one of the numerous forged photos used to promote the
Auschwitz hoax would be an appropriate test of the sincerity with which
Joos reject the anti-Gentile Hoaxoco$t Lie.
No Hoaxoco$t believing Jew can be trusted or even listened to! Holyhoax
believing Gentiles need intensive deholyhoaxotoxification therapy which is
best available by reading Germar Rudolf`s "Lectures on the Holocaust."
I see that the antisemitic denier scum's own website is down. Anyone know why.
ReplyDeleteJudy Andreas has become an apologist for the racist David Duke apparently because she thinks that he thinks that she and other Jews are okay.("Good for the Jews"). If you want to attack Mr. McNally for not debunking the "Ukrainian Holocaust" (which is a recent invention and a lie) why don't you go after Ms. Andreas for this? Because it would be mixing apples and oranges.
ReplyDeleteMcNally has said nothing at least in this piece about any Ukrainian Holocaust pro, con or neutral. Why not stick to McNally's points? I'll grant you his style can be grating and annoying and for a Jew even scary, but why not take on his points? His style ("jooish" "Jewdy Andreas" etc.) is what helps him get heard and for that he deserves credit for being clever.
As for the Auschwitz numbers, it's hard to see how the reduction of the allegation that four million people were killed there to an allegation that the correct number is around one million would not affect the total number of Jews killed during the Nazi occupation of Europe. Are you saying that the alleged four millions had been said to be overwhelmingly non Jews and that the new alleged figures represent mainly or only Jews? "The dean of Holocaust scholars" Raul Hilberg says the number is 5.1 (dead from all causes) and not six millions murdered for being Jews and the number four millions is also respectably cited as well
And do you recall the Hollywood extravaganza "Judgement at Nuremberg"? The only concentration camp where millions of Jews were said to have perished mentioned in it was Dachau.
Today it is established that there were no mass exterminations at Dachau and that the majority of inmates there were not Jews.
A big problem with comparing the "Ukrainian" and "Jewish" "Holocausts" is that the Ukrainian one has not had such a profound impact on humanity. Surely without the Jewish one there never would have been an Israel. While a novelist might toy with a "what if" book aboput a world in which Israel never was born we can agree the world would be a recognizably different place, no?
Central of course to the holocaust religion of the Jews is the unique and unmatched horror of the suffering of Jews. This is a beleif that in my opinion damages and warps people's minds, young Jews most of all.
For a real holocaust to learn from look at the Western holocaust waged against Muslim and Third World people>
http://usa.mediamonitors.net/content/view/full/8387
"As for the Auschwitz numbers, it's hard to see how the reduction of the allegation that four million people were killed there to an allegation that the correct number is around one million would not affect the total number of Jews killed during the Nazi occupation of Europe."
ReplyDeleteIt's hard to see how it _can_ lead to it. The plaque did not mention Jews at all.
"The dean of Holocaust scholars" Raul Hilberg says the number is 5.1 (dead from all causes) and not six millions murdered for being Jews and the number four millions is also respectably cited as well"
The point being?
"And do you recall the Hollywood extravaganza "Judgement at Nuremberg"? The only concentration camp where millions of Jews were said to have perished mentioned in it was Dachau."
The point being?
"Today it is established that there were no mass exterminations at Dachau and that the majority of inmates there were not Jews."
The point being?
"Surely without the Jewish one there never would have been an Israel."
Evidence?