Friday, May 25, 2018

Pia Kahn Throws the Gauntlet

Author: Andrew E. Mathis
Just a quick note to say that, today at the cesspit, CODOH Forum member Pia Kahn wrote:

Occasionally, I try to talk with the people from the holocaustcontroversies blog because they post lots of article trying to refute the revisionists However, they are not capable of arguing rationally. When you have them cornered they start ad hominem attacks, shifting the goal past, twisting words, lying, 4 letter words,... Eventually, they block me from posting on their blog although I do not respond in kind. 

I'm not sure I'm aware of any attempt by Pia Kahn to engage us at this blog. Therefore, I invite her to appear on this thread and have her say.

10 comments:

Nicholas Terry said...

Presumably Pia Kahn posts here under another handle.

For everyone's information, here is our comments policy. The main thing to note is that comments up to 90 days on from a post are open, but comments on posts older than 90 days generally aren't approved.
https://holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.co.uk/p/comments-policy.html

Gabi said...

Gotta love Hanmover's comment to the guy. "HC is a website for people who *need* to believe". As if CODOH is anything more than a circlejerk hub where people convience other people in things which they are are already convienced in.

Andrew E. Mathis said...

Since she responded at CODOH, it's worth pointing Pia to this blog post:

http://holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.com/2010/02/codoh-forum-that-moderated-itself-to.html

If she wants to debate any of us, she can always recommend a third party forum, but the idea of debating anything other than Hannover's greatness at CODOH is a non-starter.

Andrew E. Mathis said...

"I think Mr. Mathis should have the courtesy of apologizing for his vile conduct. Then, I may consider debating with him on some other forum. I won't tolerate this impertinent behavior."

Apologize to whom? To you? I haven't said or done anything to you other than invite you to engage with the bloggers here.

I call CODOH a cesspit because the name fits. That's not an insult to you; it's an insult to CODOH.

To clarify, you are welcome to debate us here. Or if you are uncomfortable doing so here, you can recommmend a third party forum. But none of us will debate at CODOH for the reasons laid out in the above post.

And I won't be apologizing to you because I've done nothing to you that requires an apology. Nor will I be apologizing to CODOH. Perhaps if/when Hannover deletes your posts pointing to our blog post about CODOH, you'll realize you were wrong about CODOH.

Jonathan Harrison said...

Let's see how long this stays up:

Re: Has anybody been able to kind of convince you to believe official holocaust narrative
Postby Pia Kahn » 10 minutes 6 seconds ago (Wed May 30, 2018 3:53 pm)

"Apologize to whom? To you? I haven't said or done anything to you other than invite you to engage with the bloggers here.
https://holocaustcontroversies.blogspot ... ntlet.html

"I call CODOH a cesspit because the name fits. That's not an insult to you; it's an insult to CODOH."

Yeah, invite me to your blog knowing full well that your double standards are not conducive to any fair debate. You don't like fair debates, do you?

Sorry mate, but I don't tolerate any insolent insults, whether they are addressed to me or CODOH. This just shows that you think insulting people you don't agree with is alright. It is not.

"And I won't be apologizing to you because I've done nothing to you that requires an apology. Nor will I be apologizing to CODOH. Perhaps if/when Hannover deletes your posts pointing to our blog post about CODOH, you'll realize you were wrong about CODOH."

If Hannover deletes my posts pointing to your blog then I will realize that I am wrong about Codoh? That's some twisted logic! So if Hannover censors my factual and verifiable post on this forum, then I will realize that I am wrong about CODOH? Again, you prove my point that rational arguments are largely absent from your blog. Then, you appear to be deeply offended by the truth about your forum. I am sorry, the truth hurts.

You cannot apologize for your misconduct. That's your choice. You are not interested in the honest and fair exchange of ideas and arguments. Therefore, I can see no benefit in arguing with people like you.

Andrew E. Mathis said...

Well then maybe stop complaining about how we censored you?

Nicholas Terry said...

There's still no evidence that 'Pia Kahn' was censored at this blog.

Incidentally, Andrew Mathis doesn't have admin rights here (by his request) and thus doesn't take part in moderation; he cannot delete comments.

Sergey Romanov said...

That's just some random nutjob. Leave it in peace.

Jonathan Harrison said...

There's a case for ignoring CODOH entirely if you apply the "random nutjob" criterion as your baseline. Hargis has driven away everybody else from the forum with his control-freak moderation and the 'Pia Kahn'/Werd incoherent trolls are all that's left there. I don't respond to Werd because his posts are word salad and even if he came on here I'd be wasting my time engaging with that kind of stream of consciousness verbiage.

Andrew E. Mathis said...

Some low hanging fruit posted here: https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=11786