Judicial notice and the burden of proofFRE 201(f) establishes that the effect of the court taking judicial notice is different in civil and criminal trials. In a civil trial, the fact taken notice of is thereby conclusively proved. In a criminal case, the defendant has the right to contest every fact that might tend to incriminate him. Therefore, the court taking judicial notice would simply allow the jury to make the finding that the court took notice of, but would not require this outcome, and would not prevent the defense from presenting evidence to rebut the noticed fact.
Monday, February 20, 2012
Author: Jonathan Harrison
From wikipedia and this legal code, note:
Posted by Jonathan Harrison at Monday, February 20, 2012