Gilad reiterated: It was the RAF that repeatedly dismissed the necessity of bombing Auschwitz.Of course, ICRC was never let to inspect even the main Auschwitz camp, not even speaking about Birkenau.
Another go of Zionist propaganda. The camp was an internment facility, attended by the Red Cross (as opposed to the US internment centre in Guantanamo). If it were bombed, the internees would die – or as a result of the bombing, or due to starvation for the supplies would not arrive. Indeed, would Gilad advise to bomb Guantanamo? This idea of “bombing Auschwitz” makes sense only if one accepts the vision of “industrial extermination factory”, and it was formed only well after the war.
The pleas to bomb Auschwitz already included information about the gassings (based on Vrba-Wetzler report and other sources) which was available long before the war was over.
Shamir is clearly ignorant of history, but thinks that he can discuss it anyway. Moreover, he shamelessly regurgitates denier manure.
He also hails deniers:
Likewise, the revisionists have religious and metaphysical tasks, even if they use some scientific words and concepts. Jurgen Graf made it clear in his important book, but the same was stated by Mahler, Zundel and others.Important book? Sorry, what important book has ever been written by denier moonbat Juergen Graf?
Elsewhere he writes:
The innocent revisionist historians were so excited when he toyed with an idea of “finally discovering the truth”. They prepared their well-thumbed books and diagrams of gas consumption and body heat.What "revisionist" historians?
And of course there is this article on his site, full of the usual "revisionist" platitudes.
Make your own conclusions.
Update: Also see this article, basically, the same denier tripe, and Shamir's comment, full of the same. But especially cute is this little bit of demagoguery:
You exclaim: "Zundel is a Jew-hater". Nobody has to love Jews.