Let's look into the arguments presented in CODOH's Holocaust Encyclopedia - Auschwitz Death Books. We'll take on a couple of the key points:
- More Christians than Jews died at Auschwitz according to the death books
The Auschwitz death books only represent a fraction of the camp’s reality. They are capturing a limited time-frame and especially excluding those directly sent to homicidal gas-chambers upon arrival. The majority of Jews were killed immediately upon arrival and they were thus not recorded in the camp books, as established by numerous perpetrator and surviver testimonies and contemporary documents. - Very young and very old people in the death books
The argument that the presence of young and old people contradicts the "orthodox narrative" of immediate gassing is misleading. Testimonies and historical records document that while the vast majority of deported people was immediately gassed, some groups were occasionally selected for labour or other purposes, including medical experiments, and could survive for varying period. - High death rates during typhus epidemics as proof of natural causes of death
While typhus and other diseases did cause high mortality rates, this argument overlooks the intentional harsh conditions created by the Nazis, such as starvation, forced labor, and inhumane living conditions, which exacerbated these outbreaks and increased mortality. The implication that the catastrophic conditions were purely incidental rather than a result of deliberate policies is historically inaccurate.
Further Reading:
The Kinna Report - German Document on the Killing of Unfit Jews in Auschwitz
Nazi Document on Mass Extermination of Jews in Auschwitz-Birkenau: The Franke-Gricksch Report
Open Letter to Nick Kollerstrom on the Auschwitz Death Books
Carlo Mattogno's Scholarly Death Certificate
Evidence on the systematic falsification of death causes in Auschwitz
Was it intentional that this was posted on Hitler's death day?
ReplyDeleteHi, I was researching document-008 and I found a website from Carlos Porter, he makes a translation of the document but makes some rampant side points about the validity of the document. I was wondering if you could debunk him?
ReplyDeletehttps://web.archive.org/web/20080723110545/https://www.cwporter.com/ussr8.htm