tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24597325.post115187461344885759..comments2024-03-20T07:25:58.202+00:00Comments on Holocaust Controversies: Correction Corner #3: who was Pranaitis and what did he do?Nicholas Terryhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14852758011968360596noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24597325.post-1159031268621181852006-09-23T18:07:00.000+01:002006-09-23T18:07:00.000+01:00"So much of the same accusations: Roman Catholics ..."So much of the same accusations: Roman Catholics are "anti-Semites" and idiots!"<BR/><BR/>Where? In your feverish brains?<BR/><BR/>"This rewriting of history is deplorable, but you don't question it"<BR/><BR/>Which rewriting? If by Samuel, then I question it in the very posting you're commenting on, idiot.<BR/><BR/>"becaue you think they are non-biased."<BR/><BR/>"They" who?<BR/><BR/>"No history can be truly without bias, but you don't check sources other than that one book you quoted, which could have been forged."<BR/><BR/>You haven't shown that anything in Tager's credible book is forged or is suspected to be forged.<BR/><BR/>"You can't question the ritual murder of St. Simon of Trent (though now "desainted"), because the Cardinal who filed the report admitted that it happened in the early 1400s."<BR/><BR/>Non sequitur.Sergey Romanovhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04063444062099331337noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24597325.post-1159025736312801532006-09-23T16:35:00.000+01:002006-09-23T16:35:00.000+01:00So much of the same accusations: Roman Catholics a...So much of the same accusations: Roman Catholics are "anti-Semites" and idiots! In fact, they don't learn anything at their own academies!!<BR/><BR/>This rewriting of history is deplorable, but you don't question it, becaue you think they are non-biased. No history can be truly without bias, but you don't check sources other than that one book you quoted, which could have been forged.<BR/><BR/>You can't question the ritual murder of St. Simon of Trent (though now "desainted"), because the Cardinal who filed the report admitted that it happened in the early 1400s.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24597325.post-1151928198051420422006-07-03T13:03:00.000+01:002006-07-03T13:03:00.000+01:00As Tager proves with the original documents, polic...As Tager proves with the original documents, police knew who the real murderers were. Parallel investigation was conducted, which was kept secret by Col. Ivanov, when he testified during the trial, all the while knowing that Beilis was innocent. There were even direct forgeries, like falsification of the original medical expert report, as Tager also proves. Tsarist officials wrote in secret reports that they hoped that Beilis would be convicted on the basis of "tribal hatred". And they came close to it - if one believes some accounts, the jury split 6:6 when asked about Beilis' personal guilt.<BR/><BR/>Also, let's not forget that the first question - whether Jushchinskij's murder was ritual (i.e., by implication, a Jewish ritual murder) - was answered positively by the jury. So in some sense the prosecution (and thus the Black Hundreds) was not completely crushed during the trial, as it should have been.Sergey Romanovhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04063444062099331337noreply@blogger.com