Part 1
Part 2
Part 3
Part 4, Section 1
Part 4, Section 2
Part 5, Section 1
Part 5, Section 2
The "Actual" Surface of the Graves
Following some of the notoriously dishonest and instructively self-projecting accusations that his rhetoric is spiked with ("Muehlenkamp, with his usual dishonesty,[…]", "Muehlenkamp misrepresents or hides my arguments and avoids providing the answers he owes,[…]") Mattogno (pp. 1270f.) quotes the arguments presented in his Bełżec book[218] in support of his claim that "the layout" Prof. Kola gives for the graves "is completely random, as is their surface area, their volume, and even their number".
Showing posts with label MGK's SPOM. Show all posts
Showing posts with label MGK's SPOM. Show all posts
Friday, March 04, 2016
Thursday, March 03, 2016
"Alleged" Mass Graves and other Mattogno Fantasies (Part 5, Section 1)
Part 1
Part 2
Part 3
Part 4, Section 1
Part 4, Section 2
Part 5, Section 1
Part 5, Section 2
Groundwater Pollution
Mattogno’s arguments in this section start with an instructive self-portrayal of Mattogno.
Part 2
Part 3
Part 4, Section 1
Part 4, Section 2
Part 5, Section 1
Part 5, Section 2
Groundwater Pollution
Mattogno’s arguments in this section start with an instructive self-portrayal of Mattogno.
Monday, February 29, 2016
"Alleged" Mass Graves and other Mattogno Fantasies (Part 4, Section 2)
Part 1
Part 2
Part 3
Part 4, Section 1
Part 4, Section 2
Part 5, Section 1
Part 5, Section 2
Capacity of the Graves (2)
The eyewitness whose testimony I invoked as supporting the possibility of grave space reuse is Kurt Gerstein. Accordingly Mattogno (pp. 1240 ff.) spends much time arguing against Gerstein’s testimony.
Part 2
Part 3
Part 4, Section 1
Part 4, Section 2
Part 5, Section 1
Part 5, Section 2
Capacity of the Graves (2)
The eyewitness whose testimony I invoked as supporting the possibility of grave space reuse is Kurt Gerstein. Accordingly Mattogno (pp. 1240 ff.) spends much time arguing against Gerstein’s testimony.
Friday, February 26, 2016
"Alleged" Mass Graves and other Mattogno Fantasies (Part 4, Section 1)
Part 1
Part 2
Part 3
Part 4, Section 1
Part 4, Section 2
Part 5, Section 1
Part 5, Section 2
Capacity of the Graves (1)
In Chapter 7 of the critique, I demonstrated that it would have been possible to bury the corpses of about 434,508 deportees to Bełżec documented in the Höfle message in the 33 mass graves identified in an archaeological investigation led by Prof. Andrzej Kola, assuming that these graves (whose total volume estimated by Kola was 21,310 cubic meters) were the only mass graves in that camp (a later study by Alex Bay suggests that this was not so and there were further graves in the camp not identified by Kola, which are visible on air photography[97]). My calculation of the possible concentration of corpses in the Bełżec mass graves was based on the substantiated assumptions that a) the Jews of Poland killed at Bełżec were not very tall people (the average height being just 1.60 meters), and b) due to their having been exposed to prolonged malnutrition, their average weight was reduced to 43 kg for adults and 16 kg for children up to 14 years old, meaning that the average weight of a population consisting two thirds of adults and one third of children up to 14 would be (43+43+16)/3 = 34 kg.
Part 2
Part 3
Part 4, Section 1
Part 4, Section 2
Part 5, Section 1
Part 5, Section 2
Capacity of the Graves (1)
In Chapter 7 of the critique, I demonstrated that it would have been possible to bury the corpses of about 434,508 deportees to Bełżec documented in the Höfle message in the 33 mass graves identified in an archaeological investigation led by Prof. Andrzej Kola, assuming that these graves (whose total volume estimated by Kola was 21,310 cubic meters) were the only mass graves in that camp (a later study by Alex Bay suggests that this was not so and there were further graves in the camp not identified by Kola, which are visible on air photography[97]). My calculation of the possible concentration of corpses in the Bełżec mass graves was based on the substantiated assumptions that a) the Jews of Poland killed at Bełżec were not very tall people (the average height being just 1.60 meters), and b) due to their having been exposed to prolonged malnutrition, their average weight was reduced to 43 kg for adults and 16 kg for children up to 14 years old, meaning that the average weight of a population consisting two thirds of adults and one third of children up to 14 would be (43+43+16)/3 = 34 kg.
Tuesday, February 23, 2016
"Alleged" Mass Graves and other Mattogno Fantasies (Part 3)
Part 1
Part 2
Part 3
Part 4, Section 1
Part 4, Section 2
Part 5, Section 1
Part 5, Section 2
Human Remains Found
Belzec
Sobibor
Treblinka
The section of the critique’s chapter 7 about findings of human remains (in a restrictive sense including only whole corpses or larger human body parts not or only partially burned, to the exclusion of the human cremation remains like ashes and bone fragments) began with a deconstruction of Mattogno’s claim that of 137 (by Mattogno’s count) core drilling samples from mass at graves Bełżec visually represented in Kola’s book, "obviously the most significant ones of the 236 samples taken altogether" in such mass graves, only 5 out of 17 visualized samples from graves nos. 3, 10 and 20 contained human remains [59].
Part 2
Part 3
Part 4, Section 1
Part 4, Section 2
Part 5, Section 1
Part 5, Section 2
Human Remains Found
Belzec
Sobibor
Treblinka
The section of the critique’s chapter 7 about findings of human remains (in a restrictive sense including only whole corpses or larger human body parts not or only partially burned, to the exclusion of the human cremation remains like ashes and bone fragments) began with a deconstruction of Mattogno’s claim that of 137 (by Mattogno’s count) core drilling samples from mass at graves Bełżec visually represented in Kola’s book, "obviously the most significant ones of the 236 samples taken altogether" in such mass graves, only 5 out of 17 visualized samples from graves nos. 3, 10 and 20 contained human remains [59].
Saturday, February 20, 2016
"Alleged" Mass Graves and other Mattogno Fantasies (Part 2)
Part 1
Part 2
Part 3
Part 4, Section 1
Part 4, Section 2
Part 5, Section 1
Part 5, Section 2
Nature and Purpose of Archaeological Investigations
In the section of the critique’s chapter 7 dedicated to the nature and purpose of the archaeological investigations conducted at Bełżec in 1997-1999, I had addressed Mattogno’s attempt to present the archaeological investigations carried out in the area of that camp as a (failed) attempt to "furnish the ‘material proof’ of the alleged extermination at Bełżec."[35], and refuted his contentions that the head of these investigations, Prof. Andrzej Kola, had been hired in order to obtain corroboration of eyewitness testimonies through physical evidence, and that the reason why he restricted his work on the mass graves to core drilling instead of excavating the graves and exhuming the corpses had been a concern – motivated by the core drilling results – that excavation would lead to conclusions incompatible with the historical record of Bełżec extermination camp.
Part 2
Part 3
Part 4, Section 1
Part 4, Section 2
Part 5, Section 1
Part 5, Section 2
Nature and Purpose of Archaeological Investigations
In the section of the critique’s chapter 7 dedicated to the nature and purpose of the archaeological investigations conducted at Bełżec in 1997-1999, I had addressed Mattogno’s attempt to present the archaeological investigations carried out in the area of that camp as a (failed) attempt to "furnish the ‘material proof’ of the alleged extermination at Bełżec."[35], and refuted his contentions that the head of these investigations, Prof. Andrzej Kola, had been hired in order to obtain corroboration of eyewitness testimonies through physical evidence, and that the reason why he restricted his work on the mass graves to core drilling instead of excavating the graves and exhuming the corpses had been a concern – motivated by the core drilling results – that excavation would lead to conclusions incompatible with the historical record of Bełżec extermination camp.
Wednesday, February 17, 2016
"Alleged" Mass Graves and other Mattogno Fantasies (Part 1)
Part 1
Part 2
Part 3
Part 4, Section 1
Part 4, Section 2
Part 5, Section 1
Part 5, Section 2
Number, Dimensions and Contents of the Mass Graves
Chapter 11 of the overlong response by Mattogno, Graf and Kues (MGK) [1] to our critique of some of their books[2] was written by Carlo Mattogno and addresses chapter 7 of the critique, which deals with the mass graves at the Aktion Reinhard(t) camps and at Chełmno extermination camp.
Part 2
Part 3
Part 4, Section 1
Part 4, Section 2
Part 5, Section 1
Part 5, Section 2
Number, Dimensions and Contents of the Mass Graves
Chapter 11 of the overlong response by Mattogno, Graf and Kues (MGK) [1] to our critique of some of their books[2] was written by Carlo Mattogno and addresses chapter 7 of the critique, which deals with the mass graves at the Aktion Reinhard(t) camps and at Chełmno extermination camp.
Wednesday, January 27, 2016
A document that forced Mattogno to claim "forgery"
[Edited on 06.02.2016 to finish an incomplete sentence.]
On 24 October 1942, the following events were recorded in the Kriegstagebuch (War Diary) of the Oberquartiermeister (Head Quarter Master), Mbfh Polen (Military Commander Poland) for the period from 1.5.41 to 31.12.43:
On 24 October 1942, the following events were recorded in the Kriegstagebuch (War Diary) of the Oberquartiermeister (Head Quarter Master), Mbfh Polen (Military Commander Poland) for the period from 1.5.41 to 31.12.43:
OKW beabsichtigt die Mitnahme von Waren aus dem GG dahin zu regeln, dass der persönliche Reisebedarf und die zur Mitnahme zugelassenen Waren frei von jeglicher Abgabe bleiben.
OK Ostrow meldet, dass die Juden in Treblinka nicht ausreichend beerdigt seien und infolgedessen ein unerträglicher Kadavergeruch die Luft verpestet.
Sunday, June 28, 2015
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (7)
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (1)
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (2)
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (3)
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (4)
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (5.1)
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (5.2)
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (6)
This blog will address Friedrich Jansson’s latest bid for "Revisionist" glory, which bears the title Memo for the controversial bloggers, part Vd: Dresden pyres, gasoline as a fuel for cremation, and High Bishopton farm
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (2)
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (3)
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (4)
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (5.1)
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (5.2)
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (6)
This blog will address Friedrich Jansson’s latest bid for "Revisionist" glory, which bears the title Memo for the controversial bloggers, part Vd: Dresden pyres, gasoline as a fuel for cremation, and High Bishopton farm
Thursday, June 25, 2015
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (6)
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (1)
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (2)
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (3)
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (4)
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (5.1)
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (5.2)
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (7)
In another of his misfires, with the title Memo for the controversial bloggers, part Vc: Herbert Floss, Treblinka, and pyre systems based on pits, Jansson starts out on the wrong foot by misrepresenting an assumption of mine regarding the Treblinka cremation structures.
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (2)
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (3)
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (4)
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (5.1)
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (5.2)
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (7)
In another of his misfires, with the title Memo for the controversial bloggers, part Vc: Herbert Floss, Treblinka, and pyre systems based on pits, Jansson starts out on the wrong foot by misrepresenting an assumption of mine regarding the Treblinka cremation structures.
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (5.2)
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (1)
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (2)
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (3)
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (4)
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (5.1)
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (6)
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (7)
In this blog I discuss what Jansson calls the "vital question" in his blog Memo for the controversial bloggers, part Vb: Lothes and Profé’s carbonization experiments with anthrax carcasses, i.e. the question "whether Muehlenkamp is correct in asserting that Lothes and Profé achieved complete cremation, or whether Carlo Mattogno was correct in assuming[109] that their experiments aimed only at more or less complete carbonization".
The present blog includes graphic images, which may be disturbing to some readers.
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (2)
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (3)
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (4)
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (5.1)
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (6)
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (7)
In this blog I discuss what Jansson calls the "vital question" in his blog Memo for the controversial bloggers, part Vb: Lothes and Profé’s carbonization experiments with anthrax carcasses, i.e. the question "whether Muehlenkamp is correct in asserting that Lothes and Profé achieved complete cremation, or whether Carlo Mattogno was correct in assuming[109] that their experiments aimed only at more or less complete carbonization".
The present blog includes graphic images, which may be disturbing to some readers.
Tuesday, June 23, 2015
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (5.1)
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (1)
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (2)
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (3)
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (4)
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (5.2)
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (6)
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (7)
Always obliging when it comes to complying with my requests, my good friend Friedrich Jansson didn’t keep me waiting too long for error-nitpicking exercise "Vb", which it will be my pleasure to dissect.
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (2)
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (3)
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (4)
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (5.2)
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (6)
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (7)
Always obliging when it comes to complying with my requests, my good friend Friedrich Jansson didn’t keep me waiting too long for error-nitpicking exercise "Vb", which it will be my pleasure to dissect.
Saturday, June 20, 2015
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (4)
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (1)
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (2)
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (3)
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (5.1)
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (5.2)
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (6)
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (7)
This previous blog of this series was originally meant to be the last. However, Jansson’s latest foot-stomping, with the overlong tabloid title Memo for the controversial bloggers, part Va: The sum of all errors: Roberto Muehlenkamp – burial space and decomposition, fits the theme of this series so well that I decided to add another installment, and further installments will probably follow as Jansson goes on hollering against the "controversial blogger" he hates most in "part Vb", "part Vc" (or "part VIa"), etc.
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (2)
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (3)
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (5.1)
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (5.2)
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (6)
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (7)
This previous blog of this series was originally meant to be the last. However, Jansson’s latest foot-stomping, with the overlong tabloid title Memo for the controversial bloggers, part Va: The sum of all errors: Roberto Muehlenkamp – burial space and decomposition, fits the theme of this series so well that I decided to add another installment, and further installments will probably follow as Jansson goes on hollering against the "controversial blogger" he hates most in "part Vb", "part Vc" (or "part VIa"), etc.
Wednesday, June 10, 2015
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (3)
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (1)
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (2)
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (4)
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (5.1)
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (5.2)
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (6)
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (7)
This blog continues the discussion of Jansson’s blog Muehlenkamp mangles mass cremation calculations, commenced in the previous blog of this series.
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (2)
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (4)
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (5.1)
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (5.2)
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (6)
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (7)
This blog continues the discussion of Jansson’s blog Muehlenkamp mangles mass cremation calculations, commenced in the previous blog of this series.
Sunday, June 07, 2015
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (2)
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (1)
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (3)
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (4)
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (5.1)
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (5.2)
´ On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (6)
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (7)
In the blog Muehlenkamp mangles mass cremation calculations, Jansson continues his somewhat-less-than-relevant error nitpicking, which will be commented in this blog.
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (3)
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (4)
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (5.1)
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (5.2)
´ On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (6)
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (7)
In the blog Muehlenkamp mangles mass cremation calculations, Jansson continues his somewhat-less-than-relevant error nitpicking, which will be commented in this blog.
Friday, June 05, 2015
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (1)
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (2)
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (3)
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (4)
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (5.1)
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (5.2)
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (6)
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (7)
As discussed in the blog There’s no history in "Revisionism" (I’m still waiting for Jansson to answer my three questions in the blog’s update, by the way) "Revisionists" have a big problem.
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (3)
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (4)
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (5.1)
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (5.2)
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (6)
On "Revisionist" error nitpicking (7)
As discussed in the blog There’s no history in "Revisionism" (I’m still waiting for Jansson to answer my three questions in the blog’s update, by the way) "Revisionists" have a big problem.
Tuesday, June 02, 2015
Jansson thought of quitting our discussions …
… before his obsessive grudge against Muehlenkamp got the better of him.
In what he announced might be his last "performance" in our debates, Friedrich Jansson commendably cut a bit on the rhetoric in the introduction, merely referring to "some more messes" of mine (read: some more arguments uncomfortable to his articles of faith), regarding which he would undertake one more "clean up job" (read: one more attempt to restore his peace of mind by restating what he is eager to believe and/or eagerly expects his readers to believe). Someone among his fellow "Revisionists" must have told him that he was putting on the rhetorical bullshit way too thick.
However, Jansson wouldn’t be Jansson if he had managed to stick with this line instead of again disgracing himself with at least one further "lie" accusation and his customary abusive bluster, as he tried to address those of my arguments he thought he could address (ignoring the rest, as usual). His attempts will be commented in this blog.
In what he announced might be his last "performance" in our debates, Friedrich Jansson commendably cut a bit on the rhetoric in the introduction, merely referring to "some more messes" of mine (read: some more arguments uncomfortable to his articles of faith), regarding which he would undertake one more "clean up job" (read: one more attempt to restore his peace of mind by restating what he is eager to believe and/or eagerly expects his readers to believe). Someone among his fellow "Revisionists" must have told him that he was putting on the rhetorical bullshit way too thick.
However, Jansson wouldn’t be Jansson if he had managed to stick with this line instead of again disgracing himself with at least one further "lie" accusation and his customary abusive bluster, as he tried to address those of my arguments he thought he could address (ignoring the rest, as usual). His attempts will be commented in this blog.
Friday, May 29, 2015
Jansson goes on fussing …
… this time about my having made "the unsubstantiated assumption that the conscientious objectors in the Minnesota starvation experiment had the same levels of body fat as the large anthrax carcasses with which Lothes and Profé worked with" .
Thursday, May 28, 2015
Jansson finally answered my Dresden Altmarkt question …
… which I last asked him in this blog.
Actually I’m not sure if his latest blog contains an answer to my question about the amount of gasoline used on the Dresden Altmarkt pyres, or rather an attempt to avoid providing an answer.
Anyway, I’ll comment on what he’s got.
Actually I’m not sure if his latest blog contains an answer to my question about the amount of gasoline used on the Dresden Altmarkt pyres, or rather an attempt to avoid providing an answer.
Anyway, I’ll comment on what he’s got.
Tuesday, May 26, 2015
The more you scratch Friedrich Jansson …
… the more the fellow loses his bearings and hysterically showers abuse on his opponent.
His latest foot-stomping, with the title Spoonfeeding the Mule, reads like Jansson is foaming at his mouth, at least the title and the introductory abuse, which is so characteristic of this lamentable individual that it will be quoted verbatim:
His latest foot-stomping, with the title Spoonfeeding the Mule, reads like Jansson is foaming at his mouth, at least the title and the introductory abuse, which is so characteristic of this lamentable individual that it will be quoted verbatim:
Roberto Muehlenkamp has again updated some posts in his futile attempt to refute my criticisms, and has again offered little but misinterpretation, incomprehension, and illiteracy. We all know what that means: it’s time for another round of spoonfeeding that dimwitted animal. As usual, I will simply ignore cases when Muehlenkamp has simply repeated himself without even acknowledging my previous refutation, and while pretending that I had not addressed an issue. (He may not be deliberately lying in these cases, as his reading comprehension is so poor that he doesn’t even notice concise rebuttals.)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)