tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24597325.post8546945899733387173..comments2024-03-29T02:19:32.860+00:00Comments on Holocaust Controversies: John Ball's Air Photo Evidence on AuschwitzNicholas Terryhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14852758011968360596noreply@blogger.comBlogger25125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24597325.post-62886078641390189302021-06-05T02:00:32.694+01:002021-06-05T02:00:32.694+01:00Sure right, the Jews stayed outside with their soa...Sure right, the Jews stayed outside with their soap and towels waiting to be gassed, stupid me...Joe Rizolihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10778263255471340924noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24597325.post-32223478310115159812015-05-21T20:26:32.346+01:002015-05-21T20:26:32.346+01:00RE: JOHN BALL
I THOUGHT THAT MASAD KILLED BALL SEV...RE: JOHN BALL<br />I THOUGHT THAT MASAD KILLED BALL SEVERAL YEARS AGO IN HIS CONDO IN WASHINGTON DC FOR DESIGING A LONG RANGE GUN FOR IRAQ I THINK BUT COULD HAVE BEEN IRAN OR SYRIA. DON'T KNOW IF IT'S THE SAME BALL OR NOT.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08294496262714491173noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24597325.post-12855156666870774232015-05-02T01:06:53.873+01:002015-05-02T01:06:53.873+01:00Hans: The photographs YOU are talking about were t...Hans: <i>The photographs YOU are talking about were taken by the Royal Air Force, there are not identical to the USAF photograph and there were obviously taken from a different plane. I already pointed this out at the blog:</i> <br /><br />You're completely wrong about that Hans; you've been misleading us all. All the photos of August 25, 1944, were taken by the same plane.<br /><br />But we now know, thanks to Lucas, that there's a bizarre difference between the Birkenau photos in the US and UK collections.<br />https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?p=72200#p72200The Black Rabbit of Inléhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12083144769375557650noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24597325.post-86172663155605112802015-03-17T22:56:49.652+00:002015-03-17T22:56:49.652+00:00Yeah, that was a howler for sure. I love it how it...Yeah, that was a howler for sure. I love it how it insinuates that the EWIW JOO COWT made a defence witness disappear, when in fact it protected said witness after she was threatened. Loser. Jeffhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03218089864137630577noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24597325.post-42083259799050155212015-03-17T11:08:59.895+00:002015-03-17T11:08:59.895+00:00I've never understood how Germans trying the...I've never understood how <b> Germans </b> trying the Einsatzgruppen is supposed to refute <b> American </b> leniency towards them. Take note that the same American leniency is proven by the very same source that dumbass tried to deceptively spin as proving that the Americans ( controlled by the Jews of course) tortured prisoners. Nathanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02660486969581542489noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24597325.post-44172977990505955922015-03-13T22:49:15.338+00:002015-03-13T22:49:15.338+00:00JH proved that the threatened defence witness at t...JH proved that the threatened defence witness at the Belsen trial was in fact provided with armed protection from the court, utterly inconsistent with neo-Nazi presentations of said proceedings as a "show trial". You did not refute this in any way and it ruined your credibility.Jeffhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03218089864137630577noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24597325.post-42913952608680945042015-03-13T22:43:30.340+00:002015-03-13T22:43:30.340+00:00IIRC, You had NOTHING to say to JH on the Belsen t...IIRC, You had NOTHING to say to JH on the Belsen thread. Nathan and I were in stitches reading it. Really. <br /><br />As I said before, if you cannot hang with the big boys at SSF then you are less than nothing to me. <br /><br />PS: I admit to grammatical errors on my earlier post, but they were cause by auto-correct. Jeffhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03218089864137630577noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24597325.post-49206142373855247802015-03-13T22:40:19.288+00:002015-03-13T22:40:19.288+00:00@Daft Rabbit: you are the last person to complain ...@Daft Rabbit: you are the last person to complain about screeching and ad homes when you offer nothing by the way of evidence to back up your own screeching. Until you have something to contribute please climb back up Scott Smith's asshole. <br />Jeffhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03218089864137630577noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24597325.post-19138799855016152092015-03-01T10:32:40.169+00:002015-03-01T10:32:40.169+00:00The Black Rabbit of Inlé:
"In essence you&#...The Black Rabbit of Inlé:<br /><br /> <i>"In essence you're right; I was unaware that Auschwitz II was photographed by two different air forces at precisely the same instant on August 25, 1944. But it was not the RAF, but the SAAF 60 Squadron who took the photos I was referring to. And Carroll L. Lucas makes no mention of the SAAF photos in the article you linked, so was presumably unaware of that fact also." </i><br /><br />Sure, the difference is only that this new set of photographs was released by the British <b>after </b> Lucas published his report, so he could not know about it, while you were unaware about the existence of two different sets of photographs even after I pointed it out in the very same blog posting you were commenting on.<br /><br /> <i>"The straw man is yours Hans; I did not claim you disputed the impossible flames from crema chimneys, I stated that you pretended they didn't exist as you choose not to mention them at all." </i><br /><br />And why should I have mentioned them in the first place? Flame emission from crematoria chimnies caused by soot accumulation is necessarily an irregular phenomen, so it does not add anything to the Revisionist claim that the absence of visible activity on aerial photographs is evidence of inactivity of the crematoria ovens. <br /><br /> <i>"Please provide some sort of evidence to back up your claim that soot is caused by flames shooting from chimneys. Outside of planet Auschwitz, it's known the reverse is true, soot causes chimney fires during which flames can actually shoot from chimneys whilst they destroy them." </i><br /><br />I did not say that soot implies that there <b>were</b> flames from the chimnies, as if soot is a consequence of flames. I wrote that soot implies that there <b>may</b> have been flames from the chimnies, exactly because soot is a necessary condition for flames. If there was soot then there also may have been flames.Hans Metznerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07746792258730274681noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24597325.post-47256082041916033182015-03-01T08:01:43.629+00:002015-03-01T08:01:43.629+00:00The Black Rabbit of Inlé said:
Hans said >>...The Black Rabbit of Inlé said:<br /><br /><i>Hans said >>> "Could you please provide a citation for your claim that Hilberg claimed that there are thousands of witnesses on flames from chimnies, thanks!"<br /><br />Certainly...</i><br /><br />Thanks! It is interesting to see that you quotemined Hilberg in your first comment on this blog posting. <br /><br />Hilberg is quoted by Kulaszka as follows:<br /><br />"They are mentioned by <b>several survivors</b>. They were mentioned by railway personnel. They were mentioned by German personnel associated with the industrial complex not very close to Birkenau"<br /><br />You will probably agree that "several" is way less than "thousands" (and further that there are way less accounts from railway personell and German Monowitz personell than from Auschwitz survivors). Hence, when Hilberg is quoted as having said "there being thousands of them" it was either a statement made in agitation (and should be treated as such) or he is misquoted in the book.Hans Metznerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07746792258730274681noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24597325.post-28510210586429221582015-02-28T16:32:50.164+00:002015-02-28T16:32:50.164+00:00Jeff said: "The Daft Rabbit seem to have it&#...Jeff said: <i>"The Daft Rabbit seem to have it's</i> <b>[SIC]</b> <i> photos mixed up, something of a repeat of it's embarrassing sophistry on the Belsen Trial Witness thread."</i><br /><br />Those basic grammatical errors are sure funny when contained within comments asserting other people are draft.<br /><br /><br />Anyway, it was poor JH who was made to look the fool on the Erika Schoepf thread as I shot down each of his "developing arguments" one after the other. His reliance on online sources was also exposed by my familiarity with primary sources on the First Belsen trial. Ragged and ruined, JH finally breathed life to a straw man about a conspiracy, that was, predictably, easily dispatched. <br /><br />Hans had at least the good sense to stay well clear of the discussion after realising his faux pas in bring the subject up in the first place.<br /><br />Yours and Nathan's screeching on that thread contained nothing but your usual ad homs., name-calling and spurious claims about fallacies, i.e nothing worthy of responding too. I made an exception here, because you made me laugh. :D<br />The Black Rabbit of Inléhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12083144769375557650noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24597325.post-64195230158375626912015-02-28T16:03:24.109+00:002015-02-28T16:03:24.109+00:00Hans said >>> "Could you please prov...<b>Hans said >>></b> <i>"Could you please provide a citation for your claim that Hilberg claimed that there are thousands of witnesses on flames from chimnies, thanks!"</i><br /><br />Certainly...<br /><br /><i>Christie turned to page 626 of Hilberg's book, The Destruction of the European Jews, and the following passage: <br /><br />Most of the Birkenau arrivals saw great flames belching from the chimneys... <br /><br />Do you believe that is true?, asked Christie. <br /><br />"Yes. As a matter of fact, in my second edition -- ," said Hilberg. <br /><br />I suggest to you, said Christie, that it cannot reasonably be true, in that crematorium chimneys do not belch flames. In fact, no chimney can belch flames without burning up very quickly. Did you consider that? <br /><br />"Let me simply say," said Hilberg, "that there are many accounts of substantially similar nature of the same phenomenon, not only by survivors, but by persons in and in the vicinity of Auschwitz... I cannot characterize the nature of what they saw myself, because I have not seen it myself." <br /><br />Do you believe those accounts?, asked Christie. <br /><br />"They are mentioned by several survivors. They were mentioned by railway personnel. They were mentioned by German personnel associated with the industrial complex not very close to Birkenau," said Hilberg. <br /><br />Could you name the names, please?, asked Christie. <br /><br />"Well, today Wiesel is another survivor, making a similar description in his book," said Hilberg. (5-1160) Hilberg agreed that Elie Wiesel was the president of the Holocaust Memorial Council by appointment of the President of the United States. <br /><br />Do you want to name any others who saw the flames belching from the chimneys?, asked Christie.<br /><br />"Well, there are a number of people. Now I would be hard-put to give you their names, but there are a number of people, as I said, belonging to the railway organization," said Hilberg. <br /><br />I am interested in the name, said Christie. Generalities are of no value to me. <br /><br />"Yes. But I did not come prepared with all of the names, there being thousands of them." <br /><br />Yes, thousands, said Christie. <br /><br />"Some of which, however, are in print. If you have the German edition of my work, I will show them to you." <br /><br />Christie indicated he would make an attempt to get the German edition of the book. <br /></i><br /><br /><br />Barbara Kulaszka, <i>'Did Six Million Really Die?' Report of the Evidence in the Canadian 'False News' Trial of Ernst Zündel – 1988</i> , Samisdat, 1992, pp. 169-170.The Black Rabbit of Inléhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12083144769375557650noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24597325.post-9317582711136083722015-02-28T16:03:05.842+00:002015-02-28T16:03:05.842+00:00Hans said >>> "I'm afraid you ar...<b>Hans said >>></b> <i>"I'm afraid you are confusing the USAF (US) and RAF (British) photographs of 25 August 1944."</i><br /><br />In essence you're right; I was unaware that Auschwitz II was photographed by two different air forces at precisely the same instant on August 25, 1944. But it was not the RAF, but the SAAF 60 Squadron who took the photos I was referring to. And Carroll L. Lucas makes no mention of the SAAF photos in the article you linked, so was presumably unaware of that fact also.<br /><br />If the photos weren't incorrectly orientated when they were numbered (which seems unlikely), then the SAAF plane was flying west when it took the photographs, i.e. away from the Buna Works...<br />http://fotos.fotoflexer.com/2d91bc5a665e03d63af31a2e7dd6e957.jpg<br /><br />...yet Lucas claims the USAF photo in question was taken on the plane's first pass over Birkenau on that day:<br /><br /><i><b>5 August 1944 Photographic Coverage was Acquired on Mission 60PR/694 60SQ by the 15th U.S. Army Air Force for Planning and BDA.</b><br />The camera focal length was 36 inches, and the flight altitude was approximately 30,000 feet, making the scale of the photography approximately 1:10,000 at nadir. The best photographic resolution was on the order of 4-6 feet. Stereo coverage of Birkenau was available. The complex was covered twice during the mission. The first images cover only the southernmost portion of the complex but include the railroad classification yard outside Birkenau as well as the railroad yard within the facility. It provided the best quality photography acquired over the site during the time frame studied. The second coverage recorded the whole facility but is severely degraded by heavy haze, and smoke from the operating smoke generators protecting the targeted industrial facility. The following comments are on activities observed only on the first coverage, because of the poor quality of the subsequent coverage.</i><br /><br /><br />These must be the photos taken on the USAF plane's second pass, and with the same consideration applied to the SAAF photos, the USAF plane was also flying west:<br />http://fotos.fotoflexer.com/c44e0a767f1bdfa8df5f24faf2f51435.jpg<br />http://digitalassets.ushmm.org/photoarchives/detail.aspx?id=28531&search=&index=4<br />http://digitalassets.ushmm.org/photoarchives/detail.aspx?id=28532&search=&index=5<br /><br /><br />The USAF photo in question, which you linked above in a cropped version, must be this one on the USHMM (who clearly flip and reverse it at will)<br />http://digitalassets.ushmm.org/photoarchives/detail.aspx?id=28986&search=&index=12<br />http://digitalassets.ushmm.org/photoarchives/detail.aspx?id=28972&search=&index=8<br /><br /><br />Have you actually seen the original USAF photos of Aug 25, or just mostly cropped, disoriented, and small versions of the same frame online? What about the other photos taken in the first pass, do they help establish the direction in which the plane was flying on it's first pass? And do you know where these planes (which must have been flying together) flew from?<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><b>Hans said >>></b> <i>Actually, you making a straw man argument here. I did not dispute flames from crematoria chimnies. In fact, I pointed out that the chimnies did emit smoke (as there is soot at their top), which also implies that there may have been flames from the chimnies.</i><br /><br />The straw man is yours Hans; I did not claim you <b>disputed</b> the impossible flames from crema chimneys, I stated that you pretended they didn't exist as you choose not to mention them at all.<br /><br />Please provide some sort of evidence to back up your claim that soot is caused by flames shooting from chimneys. Outside of planet Auschwitz, it's known the reverse is true, soot causes chimney fires during which flames can actually shoot from chimneys whilst they destroy them.The Black Rabbit of Inléhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12083144769375557650noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24597325.post-53916704241167492942015-02-25T19:12:28.596+00:002015-02-25T19:12:28.596+00:00Yes Jacob, I can explain them. They were photo-sho...Yes Jacob, I can explain them. They were photo-shopped by you in order to create a collage of 'fantasy' pictures to adorn your bedroom wall. <br /><br />But if you're trying to put forward this as some sort of 'proof' that thousands of Jews were deliberately starved to death and mistreated by your 'silly trouser' wearing ancestors in concentration camps, then well done, you have succeeded. If on the other hand you are trying to prove something else, then basically you're a twat. Goodnight.Arthur Crumphttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02528152257644027463noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24597325.post-39327860283511025572015-02-25T08:25:16.716+00:002015-02-25T08:25:16.716+00:00Hello there, can someone help explain these photos...Hello there, can someone help explain these photos?<br />http://i51.tinypic.com/9vgjg1.png<br />http://img838.imageshack.us/img838/9989/1329220607475.jpgJacobhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07099500455962505463noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24597325.post-67131695934383596402015-02-25T08:25:00.093+00:002015-02-25T08:25:00.093+00:00Hello there, can someone help explain these photos...Hello there, can someone help explain these photos?<br />http://i51.tinypic.com/9vgjg1.png<br />http://img838.imageshack.us/img838/9989/1329220607475.jpgJacobhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07099500455962505463noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24597325.post-70233178562899105342015-02-21T03:23:17.008+00:002015-02-21T03:23:17.008+00:00The correspondence between the air photos (atteste...The correspondence between the air photos (attested as authentic) and the Auschwitz Calendrium is unmistakable.<br /><br />Now hop along little bunny rabbit....Jeffhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03218089864137630577noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24597325.post-535235826834602752015-02-21T03:21:22.647+00:002015-02-21T03:21:22.647+00:00It's fairly irrefutable that flames did shoot ...It's fairly irrefutable that flames did shoot out from the chimney's due to soot build-up. Numerous witnesses have described it. As Hans pointed out, The Daft Rabbit seem to have it's photos mixed up, something of a repeat of it's embarrassing sophistry on the Belsen Trial Witness thread.<br /><br />In all his time here, he has failed to raise a single good point or provide any evidence at all for his silly belief that four million Jews were simply transited to (????) and abducted by aliens along the way. Imbecile. <br /><br />He really needs to stay over at the skinhead shithole that RODOH has become and not embarrass himself any further. That or come over to SSF and see if he can hang with the big boys (spoiler: he can't) Jeffhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03218089864137630577noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24597325.post-83699917298322146082015-02-20T17:29:29.305+00:002015-02-20T17:29:29.305+00:00The Black Rabbit of Inlé:
"And further sham...The Black Rabbit of Inlé: <br /><br /><i>"And further shame on you for pretending that the "thousands" (according to R. Hilberg) of survivor claims about having witnessed flames shooting (anywhere up to 75 feet into the sky) from the crematoria chimneys do not exist."</i><br /><br />Could you please provide a citation for your claim that Hilberg claimed that there are thousands of witnesses on flames from chimnies, thanks! <br /><br />Actually, you making a straw man argument here. I did not dispute flames from crematoria chimnies. In fact, I pointed out that the chimnies did emit smoke (as there is soot at their top), which also implies that there may have been flames from the chimnies. <br /><br />What I discussed in the blog is the *frequency* and *magnitude* of smoke emission. I argue that there is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the crematoria *always* emitted *heavy* smoke (visible on aerial photographs) when in operation. This does not rule out that there were flames from the chimnies from time to time.Hans Metznerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07746792258730274681noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24597325.post-70093199664454638692015-02-20T17:13:44.885+00:002015-02-20T17:13:44.885+00:00The Black Rabbit of Inlé:
"Assuming you'v...The Black Rabbit of Inlé:<br /><i>"Assuming you've not quoted her out of context, what's she claims is untrue."</i><br /><br />Carroll Lucas is a guy (I misspelled him Caroll in twice in the blog) and you can read his full report via the wayback machine here:<br /><br />https://web.archive.org/web/20100410211303/http://www.mossadist.by.ru/Appendix_IV.htm<br /><br />The Black Rabbit of Inlé::<br /><i>"The formations are visible in (the widely available on the internet) frames 4185 and 4186, and in neither are the formations anywhere near the edge; in 4186 the formations are closer to the centre than the edge."</i><br /><br />I'm afraid you are confusing the USAF (US) and RAF (British) photographs of 25 August 1944. The photograph John Ball was talking about, and that Carroll Lucas analyzed for tampering, was taken by the US Air Force. From this series of frames there is indeed only one exposure showing the camp section with the standing formation, and the formation is indeed at the edge of the frame:<br /><br />http://www.globalsecurity.org/intell/library/imint/images/09-1306a.jpg<br /><br />So much on your "transparent charlatan" allegation.<br /><br />The photographs YOU are talking about were taken by the Royal Air Force, there are not identical to the USAF photograph and there were obviously taken from a different plane. I already pointed this out at the blog: <br /><br />"The US Air Force was not alone on their aerial reconnaissance mission at the Auschwitz (Monowitz) complex on 25 August 1944. At the same time, the British RAF was also photographing the area and made four consecutive shots of Auschwitz-Birkenau. Both formations of people Ball claims are fake on the USAF photograph can also been seen on the corresponding RAF photographs (e.g. the standing formation in camp section BII on exposure 4186). They are obviously authentic features on the ground - and Ball must be one of the poorest air photo analysts ever."Hans Metznerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07746792258730274681noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24597325.post-53637335991212217162015-02-20T16:03:31.400+00:002015-02-20T16:03:31.400+00:00- If the formations "only" appeared in ...- If the formations "only" appeared in a single frame, then that would be strong evidence that it had been tampered with!-<br /><br />No. It's nothing but evidence of an accident. A true "tamperer" would've tampered with all the frames. Why stop at one and allow idiots like this one to cry "conspiracy!", why not tamper with the others?<br /><br />The mind is a wonderful thing to use. Too bad this loser can't use it. <br /><br />-And further shame on you for pretending that the <b>"thousands"</b> (according to R. Hilberg) of survivor claims about having witnessed flames shooting (anywhere up to <b>75 feet into the sky</b>) from the crematoria chimneys do not exist. Even <b>two</b> SS men testified to having seen <b>2 and 5 metres</b> flames shooting from the Birkenau crema chimneys-<br /><br />And the butthurt dumbass hits us with a non sequitur. What a joke. <br /><br />Nothing more than an internet loser showing his envy towards a real expert who's far more credible than this idiot will ever be. Move along. <br /><br />Trash.Nathanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02660486969581542489noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24597325.post-29017535749390581582015-02-18T02:18:58.085+00:002015-02-18T02:18:58.085+00:00Jeff asked:
Question: who installs showers in a c...Jeff asked:<br /><br /><i>Question: who installs showers in a crematorium?</i><br /><br />Answer: Amongst others, the Nazis. <br /><br />Get yourself to Buchenwald, go to the crematorium, have a look thru the big glass pane on the left, perpetually locked door on the south wall of the oven room, and you'll see a shower.<br /><br /><br />The Black Rabbit of Inléhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12083144769375557650noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24597325.post-53605674552858115232015-02-18T02:08:04.085+00:002015-02-18T02:08:04.085+00:00"These formations are at the extreme edge of ...<i>"These formations are at the extreme edge of the photograph and can only be observed on one frame."</i> - Caroll Lucas (as quoted by Hans).<br /><br />Assuming you've not quoted her out of context, what's she claims is untrue. The formations are visible in (the widely available on the internet) frames 4185 and 4186, and in neither are the formations anywhere near the edge; in 4186 the formations are closer to the centre than the edge.<br /><br />Surely she would know that the structure was captured in several photos in that particular overpass. If the formations "only" appeared in a single frame, then <i>that</i> would be strong evidence that <i>it</i> had been tampered with!<br /><br />Shame on you for passing off such a transparent charlatan as an "expert" Hans.<br /><br />And further shame on you for pretending that the "thousands" (according to R. Hilberg) of survivor claims about having witnessed flames shooting (anywhere up to 75 feet into the sky) from the crematoria chimneys do not exist. Even two SS men testified to having seen 2 and 5 metres flames shooting from the Birkenau crema chimneys; usually the say-so of a SS-man during his trial is irrefutable evidence for the writers on this blog.<br /><br /><br /><i>"SS ground photographs of crematorium 2 and 5 show black soot at the top of the chimney, which is a clear sign that there was emission of considerable smoke at some point before"</i> - Hans, HC blogger<br /><br /><i>"We know that the flames regularly appeared out of Auschwitz chimneys because of collected soot."</i> - Sergey Romanov, HC blogger<br />http://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=96187&start=30<br /><br /><br />Incidentally, on the museum signs present at the northern-end of Compound BIIe, this structure, or at least the actual Pferdestallbaracken, not the additional structure that—according to you—only features in the August and September 1944 photos, is stated as being "Latrines and washrooms". The Black Rabbit of Inléhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12083144769375557650noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24597325.post-70966360206579246382015-02-08T21:51:41.807+00:002015-02-08T21:51:41.807+00:00Question: who installs showers in a crematorium?
...Question: who installs showers in a crematorium? <br /><br />It makes no sense. <br /><br />Who installs a "delousing chamber" in a crematorium? Jeffhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03218089864137630577noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24597325.post-39951131561921772662015-02-08T14:18:04.994+00:002015-02-08T14:18:04.994+00:00You know, on the old JREF thread, someone once tri...You know, on the old JREF thread, someone once tried explaining to an idiot that their photo "analysis" from Udo Walendy didn't stick. That it was just nitpicking and that the right way was to verify the photos' chain of custody as you, Bryant and Lucas have done. <br /><br />The point sailed right over the idiots' head. They think they're so clever, but they're not.<br /><br />Thank you for the good read, Hans. Keep up the good work.Nathanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02660486969581542489noreply@blogger.com