tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24597325.post7195905925732037606..comments2024-03-29T02:19:32.860+00:00Comments on Holocaust Controversies: Belzec Mass Graves and Archaeology: My Response to Carlo Mattogno (4,1)Nicholas Terryhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14852758011968360596noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24597325.post-579996314584401982018-02-10T12:02:55.327+00:002018-02-10T12:02:55.327+00:00I may misunderstand, but I don't misrepresent....I may misunderstand, but I don't misrepresent. <br /><br />Anyway, the 20+ corpses per cubic meter argument is yesterday's news. Today's you find in this article: <br /><br /><a href="http://holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.pt/2016/02/alleged-mass-graves-and-other-mattogno_26.html" rel="nofollow">"Alleged" Mass Graves and other Mattogno Fantasies (Part 4, Section 1)</a>Roberto Muehlenkamphttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03608133715777146924noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24597325.post-27772310850129692392018-02-10T05:12:57.375+00:002018-02-10T05:12:57.375+00:00Oh, nevermind. Mattogno is again using what is be...Oh, nevermind. Mattogno is again using what is being claimed, not his own estimate, on page 134. It is claimed that 275 bodies were stuffed into a room of 41.6 m^3.<br /><br />So it looks like I was making the same mistake as you. You'd think he'd write more clearly!blake121666https://www.blogger.com/profile/07355647679491593871noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24597325.post-51426116326415428312018-02-10T04:48:02.753+00:002018-02-10T04:48:02.753+00:00Actually, it looks like I'm wrong. Mattogno h...Actually, it looks like I'm wrong. Mattogno has 18.2 bodies per cubic meter being in the gas chambers on page 134. Pretty weird.blake121666https://www.blogger.com/profile/07355647679491593871noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24597325.post-25264056116150275732018-02-10T00:17:33.706+00:002018-02-10T00:17:33.706+00:00You have misrepresented the Mattogno quote about t...You have misrepresented the Mattogno quote about the 22 bodies per cubic meter burial density - which is easy to do since it written (or possibly translated) so poorly.<br /><br />He is saying that even if one were take a density of 22 bodies per cubic meter, then 3000 bodies would be a whopping 135 cubic meters. He is not saying that bodies would be that high a density.<br /><br />You've misrepresented that poorly worded statement in his book.blake121666https://www.blogger.com/profile/07355647679491593871noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24597325.post-43369496092954345532017-02-04T11:36:12.864+00:002017-02-04T11:36:12.864+00:00Mr. Roberto I enjoy your post, but isn't Kola&...Mr. Roberto I enjoy your post, but isn't Kola's report kind of useless without pictures of his core samples? It's not going to convince deniers of anything, even though the most recent archeological investigations have vindicated what he said about Sobibor. Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01733326304927122323noreply@blogger.com