tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24597325.post4405521357169293663..comments2024-03-29T02:19:32.860+00:00Comments on Holocaust Controversies: Mattogno, his Einsatzgruppen book and the Gas Vans. Part V: Nazi Foreign Office Documents vs. Holocaust DenialNicholas Terryhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14852758011968360596noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24597325.post-484264896243055262019-03-02T22:45:57.302+00:002019-03-02T22:45:57.302+00:00This blog has practically eviscerated the Holocaus...This blog has practically eviscerated the Holocaust deniers! There is not much more left for them.<br />Keep it going, you are doing a service for everybody.<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24597325.post-89603091512400316312019-01-24T20:39:46.234+00:002019-01-24T20:39:46.234+00:00> At least one document, "K206915", w...> At least one document, "K206915", went walkies before this British complied dossier made it to its current home.<br /><br />You... do realize K206915 is just the reverse side of K206914, right?Sergey Romanovhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04063444062099331337noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24597325.post-14232465924943398602019-01-24T19:46:51.841+00:002019-01-24T19:46:51.841+00:00> 3 of the documents must have previously been ...> 3 of the documents must have previously been in 2 different dossiers. They all feature 2 further sets of 7-digit Bates numbering. <br /><br />You mean they were filmed for different dossiers (or whatever), since this is apparently what the numbers mean? Because if you mean that they were physically separated, you have to show it.Sergey Romanovhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04063444062099331337noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24597325.post-62039641601086022492019-01-24T16:37:50.450+00:002019-01-24T16:37:50.450+00:00I think the burden of proof here clearly lies with...I think the burden of proof here clearly lies with BroI. You can't just insinuate that something might be suspicious until you've refuted the benign alternatives.<br /><br />But also this distracts from the point of the posting - how Mattogno treats the sources. Jonathan Harrisonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07929794273877529591noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24597325.post-3378529611083325412019-01-24T06:26:50.106+00:002019-01-24T06:26:50.106+00:00Would they have filmed or skipped clear duplicates...Would they have filmed or skipped clear duplicates in a file? <br /><br />Fun fact: Mattogno believes that "it should be noted that the 'Geheim' stamp and those indicating the registration numbers 'K206919,' 'H322193' and 'E421193' are doubtlessly authentic, that is, <b>genuine stamps then in use at the Reich Ministry of Foreign Affairs</b>, as shown by other letters by Eberhard von Thadden, such as those published by Randolph L. Braham." (The Einsatzgruppen in the Occupied Eastern Territories, p.329)Hans Metznerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07746792258730274681noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24597325.post-87674968395280566092019-01-24T03:00:35.258+00:002019-01-24T03:00:35.258+00:00>>> "The document is not an isolated...>>> "The document is not an isolated piece but part of a dossier with the signature PA AA, RZ 214, R 100848b, Bl.272-278."<br /><br /><br />If <a href="http://www.fpp.co.uk/Letters/Auschwitz/Hebden300505.html" rel="nofollow">Irving's</a> right about the "K" series Bates numbering, and considering what I detail below, this dossier was complied in Britain. Did you know that?<br /><br /><a href="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-d4xdGBfZRXE/XEko3gEO7nI/AAAAAAAATj4/EugN_E5iyZUU5g-IBUyrPaIjreb-qyMwgCLcBGAs/s1600/Kubes%2BGaskammer%2Bin%2BMinsk.png" rel="nofollow">3 of the documents must have previously been in 2 different dossiers. They all feature 2 further sets of 7-digit Bates numbering.</a> <br /><br />VTh's signed note 15 May 1943 [presumably along with his initialled copy of the note—which doesn't bear any 7-digit Bates stamping] was at one stage in an entirely different dossier to the copy of his letter to Windecker, 17 May 1943.<br /><br />I'm assuming the 3-digit Bates numbering was done by the archive which now holds the dossier. The stamp isn't on the Eichmann trial copy of vTh's signed note <a href="http://holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.com/2010/01/thereafter-kube-had-shown-italians-gas.html" rel="nofollow">posted</a> by Romanov. <br /><br />At least one document, "K206915", went walkies before this British complied dossier made it to its current home.The Black Rabbit of Inléhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12083144769375557650noreply@blogger.com