tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24597325.post2537138942332654411..comments2024-03-29T02:19:32.860+00:00Comments on Holocaust Controversies: Lying about the dating of Orders: the Wisliceny TestimoniesNicholas Terryhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14852758011968360596noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24597325.post-2240138119965336722019-05-30T11:30:04.947+01:002019-05-30T11:30:04.947+01:00The last post here is almost a year old, but for w...The last post here is almost a year old, but for what it's worth, Wisliceny's testimony at Nuremberg and his Bratislava statement on November 18th, 1946, are now available here:<br /><br />https://www.ns-archiv.de/personen/wisliceny-dieter/aussage-18-11-1946.php<br />https://www.ns-archiv.de/personen/wisliceny-dieter/aussage-03-01-1946.php<br /><br />jlangowskihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10482785790642576566noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24597325.post-57750066216399351292018-08-15T08:41:05.894+01:002018-08-15T08:41:05.894+01:00This comment has been removed by the author.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24597325.post-73935349583179600522018-08-08T21:19:37.034+01:002018-08-08T21:19:37.034+01:00It's not a problem to ask more questions - a g...It's not a problem to ask more questions - a great deal *is* online, so as long as you develop a feel for what is not likely to be digitised, then it doesn't hurt to ask. Most West German legal cases aren't online, but the Frankfurt Auschwitz trial and pretrial investigation are, for example.Nicholas Terryhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14852758011968360596noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24597325.post-50558427164618751582018-08-08T19:53:41.434+01:002018-08-08T19:53:41.434+01:00Thank you for your answer. I am sorry if my questi...Thank you for your answer. I am sorry if my questions are a bit too much. I have finally understood that not all documents are going to be free online due to privacy issues, so I am not going to bother you with any more questions regarding questions documents I couldn't find online.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24597325.post-89826847935800716622018-08-08T13:02:01.082+01:002018-08-08T13:02:01.082+01:00As a general piece of advice, while Google does ca...As a general piece of advice, while Google does capture finding-guide pages from Yad Vashem's documents archive, other online archives might not. <br /><br />The full range of currently open access online archives for this subject (broadly defined) is listed here - while this is an immense amount compared to other eras of history, it is a drop in the ocean<br />https://holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.com/p/open-access-holocaust-sources-and.html<br /><br />The most comprehensive digitisation is at Yad Vashem which has hitherto reached 20,000 online files, but various archival agreements, national legislation in different European countries, and privacy rules mean that some record groups are indexed only.<br /><br />The EHRI finding guide to archival collections is very useful, but most described record group will not be online.<br />https://portal.ehri-project.eu/Nicholas Terryhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14852758011968360596noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24597325.post-2985844747497482262018-08-08T12:57:12.042+01:002018-08-08T12:57:12.042+01:00Wisliceny's IMT-Nuremberg interrogations are p...Wisliceny's IMT-Nuremberg interrogations are partially published in Richard Overy, Interrogations, but should also be online at fold3.com - there is a collection within the WWII/Holocaust section of Nuremberg interrogations. While fold3.com requires a sign-up and the website charges for access, the Nuremberg interrogations are often available for free.<br /><br />The affidavits were distilled down from Q&A stenographic protocols of interrogations, usually with considerable accuracy, but the full interrogations also usually elaborate on what was said and in Wisliceny's case, make the sources of his information clearer.<br /><br />Yad Vashem's document archive (access the catalogue by the first link on this page<br />http://www.yadvashem.org/yv/en/resources/documents.asp )<br />has Wisliceny statements from Bratislava in M.5, e.g. M.5/162. These are in German.<br /><br />when using advanced search, the M.5 goes in record group and must include the full stop, the 165 in file number<br />a general keyword search for Wisliceny identifies 38 files not all of which are digitised, a mixture of contemporary documents and various postwar investigations.<br /><br />The most important Wisliceny statement from Bratislava is also published in Poliakov/Wulf, Dritte Reich und die Juden (1955)<br />Nicholas Terryhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14852758011968360596noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24597325.post-30656203999127844762018-08-07T23:58:05.367+01:002018-08-07T23:58:05.367+01:00Would you know where Wisliceny's Bratislava te...Would you know where Wisliceny's Bratislava testimony could be and if so I would really like to see it. I tried looking it up and I didn't find anything. <br /><br />I might be asking a little way to much, but there is something about Wisliceny's Nuremberg affadavit and the corresponding testimony that I find very unsettling and it's been bugging me for quite a while in the context of Holocaust research. I really need to carefully examine each relevant document before I come to a final conclusion about the matter.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com