tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24597325.post242937443365443157..comments2024-03-17T20:28:40.281+00:00Comments on Holocaust Controversies: Belzec, Sobibor, Treblinka. Holocaust Denial and Operation Reinhard. Introduction (1)Nicholas Terryhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14852758011968360596noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24597325.post-34793309588023587582011-12-27T00:25:38.282+00:002011-12-27T00:25:38.282+00:00I would leave out the "copyright" argume...I would leave out the "copyright" argument (though it is in Anglo-American tradition a cherished notion) in connection with quotations. Copyright is a very double-edged sword, it hinders free flow of information and gives the authors very little back. If one wants to argue with a text or analyze it, one often has to quote it lengthily. IMO the argument you bring, quoted here: "Thus 40% of Mattogno’s work was simply quotes, often produced without analysis or comment, or even an explanation on why such lengthy quotes were included" is strong and sufficient.Joachim Neanderhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13147464375787485394noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24597325.post-25275801499278947512011-12-27T00:24:30.691+00:002011-12-27T00:24:30.691+00:00This comment has been removed by the author.Joachim Neanderhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13147464375787485394noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24597325.post-46414611966827070432011-12-27T00:23:56.507+00:002011-12-27T00:23:56.507+00:00I would leave out the "copyright" argume...I would leave out the "copyright" argument (though it is in Anglo-American tradition a cherished notion) in connection with quotations. Copyright is a very double-edged sword, it hinders free flow of information and gives the authors very little back. If one wants to argue with a text or analyze it, one often has to quote it lengthily. IMO the argument you bring, quoted here: "Thus 40% of Mattogno’s work was simply quotes, often produced without analysis or comment, or even an explanation on why such lengthy quotes were included" is strong and sufficient.Joachim Neanderhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13147464375787485394noreply@blogger.com