tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24597325.post115227633186782197..comments2024-03-29T13:40:51.077+00:00Comments on Holocaust Controversies: Learn English, "Claudia"!Nicholas Terryhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14852758011968360596noreply@blogger.comBlogger12125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24597325.post-16653248617745100282010-02-02T05:47:18.748+00:002010-02-02T05:47:18.748+00:00Claudiarothenbach,
how can you say that the holoc...Claudiarothenbach,<br /><br />how can you say that the holocaust didn't even happen when there are people and the remains of the people and the concentration camps to prove it? Even more, the place might wear down after many years, but the people, such as Elie Weisel, still remember the horrible things that happened to them and other people. Memory never forgets.<br /><br />YOU'RE A HORRIBLE PERSON AND A HORRIBLE LIAR!!Writer's Blockhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08669213570506568578noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24597325.post-1152350828669913762006-07-08T10:27:00.000+01:002006-07-08T10:27:00.000+01:00Better yet, just click here.Better yet, just click <A HREF="http://holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.com/2006/04/quick-links.html" REL="nofollow">here</A>.Sergey Romanovhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04063444062099331337noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24597325.post-1152350744544451302006-07-08T10:25:00.000+01:002006-07-08T10:25:00.000+01:00Hello. Please, check out the "Quick links" referen...Hello. Please, check out the "Quick links" reference on the main page. There's a special section on these clips.<BR/><BR/>And don't forget to check out refutations of individual deniers' arguments (e.g., the posting about why the diesel issue is irrelevant).Sergey Romanovhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04063444062099331337noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24597325.post-1152319023515414562006-07-08T01:37:00.000+01:002006-07-08T01:37:00.000+01:00I just finished immersing myself in the streaming ...I just finished immersing myself in the streaming videos concerning contrary evidence for diesel engine gassings, burial pit space, disinterment and open air cremations at the "Aktion Reinhardt Camps" here:<BR/><BR/>http://zamphir.lit.letek.ws/<BR/><BR/>Being a bit backwards when it comes to computers (I didn't grow up with them). I couldn't find a way to start a new thread so my comment relevant to this Claudia Rothenbach thread is really a question. Are the bloggers here aware of this website and if so, where can I go to examine any oppositional commentary on it?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24597325.post-1152289619910498032006-07-07T17:26:00.000+01:002006-07-07T17:26:00.000+01:00I guess a simple analogy would be rust penetration...I guess a simple analogy would be rust penetration - rust doesn't move, it is created in situ, but we still can say that rust penetrated.Sergey Romanovhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04063444062099331337noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24597325.post-1152287667181282342006-07-07T16:54:00.000+01:002006-07-07T16:54:00.000+01:00As shown, Mazal made no mistake, and the only peop...As shown, Mazal made no mistake, and the only people being dishonest are deniers. Mazal never said that PB moved in the walls, and since the mistake has been pointed out to "Claudia", we know that "she" lies.Sergey Romanovhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04063444062099331337noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24597325.post-1152286317906764622006-07-07T16:31:00.000+01:002006-07-07T16:31:00.000+01:00Sergey is arguing dishonest. Additionally he is ch...Sergey is arguing dishonest. Additionally he is changing his argument in the wind.<BR/><BR/>Mazal's and Green's attempt (based on Roth's "testimony") is that only the first micrometers of the wall contain Prussianblue - because any CN compound not movable in the walls. This way they criticise the sampling of Leuchter.<BR/><BR/>That is bullshit. And dishonest as well.<BR/><BR/>Secondly Mazal's attempt is wrong. Prussianblue does not move in walls. Mazal made a mistake and Green put it into a lawsuite report.<BR/><BR/>If you do not believe it read on:<BR/>http://www.holocaust-history.org/irving-david/rudolf/affweb.pdfAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24597325.post-1152281709859247552006-07-07T15:15:00.000+01:002006-07-07T15:15:00.000+01:00"But the dispersion of Prussianblue in the walls o..."But the dispersion of Prussianblue in the walls of Auschwitz is not result of the penetration of Prussianblue - it is caused by the diffusion (penetration) of HCN in the pores followed by adsorption and precipitation."<BR/><BR/>The mistake is only in "Claudia's" fertile imagination. I have already explained that in Mazal's report penetration has nothing to do with "moving". If he were to write: "penetration of Prussian Blue into the wall material <B>was</B> minimal", then he would be talking about the process of diffusion of PB in the wall. He wrote no such thing. He is talking about the current situation (thus "is"), and thus about the depth of the stain. PB <B>is</B> penetrating the wall (though it never moved in the wall). Aqueous solution penetrated the wall (to some degree). It caused PB staining. The the staining penetrates the wall.Sergey Romanovhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04063444062099331337noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24597325.post-1152280419707095642006-07-07T14:53:00.000+01:002006-07-07T14:53:00.000+01:00Sergey writes: "But, as usual, ignorant or lying d...Sergey writes: "But, as usual, ignorant or lying deniers create laughable arguments out of nothing."<BR/><BR/>Look into the Green affidavit. There is a whole chapter about the critics on the usage of the wort "extraction" by Rudolf. There is even a reference to another essay (Keren) that also criticises the usage of this word.<BR/><BR/>And some pages later an error like this.<BR/><BR/>FatalAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24597325.post-1152280173399017652006-07-07T14:49:00.000+01:002006-07-07T14:49:00.000+01:00Dear Roman Werpachowski, there is penetration in c...Dear Roman Werpachowski, there is penetration in chemistry and physics and many substances penetrate other materials.<BR/><BR/>But the dispersion of Prussianblue in the walls of Auschwitz is not result of the penetration of Prussianblue - it is caused by the diffusion (penetration) of HCN in the pores followed by adsorption and precipitation.<BR/><BR/>Because this is the core process of the discussion about the Zyklon B gas chambers it is important to be exact.<BR/><BR/>Exactitude!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24597325.post-1152279898660544902006-07-07T14:44:00.000+01:002006-07-07T14:44:00.000+01:00I can only repeat my advice. Penetration need not ...I can only repeat my advice. Penetration need not involve a dynamic component. "Penetration of PB" means depth of the stain. If, for example, the stain is 1 mm deep, I can say: "Prussian blue penetrates the wall to the depth of 1 mm". It doesn't mean that at this very moment the PB stain is moving ("penetrates") within the wall. It obviously denotes a static situation - the depth of the stain is 1 mm.<BR/><BR/>It's that easy. But, as usual, ignorant or lying deniers create laughable arguments out of nothing.<BR/><BR/>PS: "move" does not even appear among the meanings in http://www.bartleby.com/61/29/P0162900.htmlSergey Romanovhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04063444062099331337noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24597325.post-1152277590381121292006-07-07T14:06:00.000+01:002006-07-07T14:06:00.000+01:00Sergey writes: “Now, to every person who has both ...Sergey writes: “Now, to every person who has both a basic knowledge of English and a brain, it is clear that Mr. Mazal is talking about the depth of the stain.”<BR/><BR/>I state: Mr. Mazal is writing (and Dr. Green is citing him) about a delicate point in the discussion about CN compounds in the walls of Auschwitz. In this discussion it is important to know that HCN gas is very agile in walls whilest Prussianblue is absolutely not movable.<BR/><BR/>These are the core characteristics of the most important substances in the Zyklon B gas chamber discussion. It seems that Mazal did not understand the process completely.<BR/><BR/>Sergey does not know what the word penetration means. He wrote: “Penetration of PB into the wall denotes a depth to which it is found on the wall surface (1 mm, 2 mm etc.).” The truth is that penetration means: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penetration (Move into something).<BR/><BR/>At this point it is important to know that Prussianblue does not move at all.<BR/><BR/>Here are the words that Mazal should have used instead of “penetration”:<BR/>allocation apportionment arrangement assignment dispensation dispersal dispersion disposition dissemination distribution repartition spreading<BR/><BR/>Seem to be enough!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com